From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Introduce aliases for matches and targets Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 21:56:11 +0100 Message-ID: <20130130205611.GA3287@localhost> References: <1359405175-4394-1-git-send-email-kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org To: Jozsef Kadlecsik Return-path: Received: from slan-550-85.anhosting.com ([174.127.110.175]:48282 "EHLO slan-550-85.anhosting.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755991Ab3A3WGd (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jan 2013 17:06:33 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1359405175-4394-1-git-send-email-kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Jozsef, On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 09:32:52PM +0100, Jozsef Kadlecsik wrote: > The next patches introduce the alias support for matches and targets in > iptables. The goal is to keep the old syntax of matches/targets merged > into "super" matches/targets. This way firewall scripts can run unmodified, > using the old extensions. > > The NOTRACK alias requires a new revision of the CT target (flags are checked > in the current revision). Next follows the kernel part of the patches. Until > the new revision is missing, instead of the warning, a notice is printed > to the users. I'm proposing a new version for the CT target. I wanted to merge common code of revision 0 and 1 since time ago, then it follows the patch to add the new flag. > Please comment/ACK the patches. I like this.