netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>,
	netfilter-devel <netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: api: add connlabel api and attribute
Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2013 13:02:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130203120245.GA32074@breakpoint.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130203095921.GA3560@localhost>

Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org> wrote:
> > The existing setters all copy their argument, but the current connlabel
> > setter only assigns the pointer, i.e., 'ownership' of the bitmask object
> > is then tied to conntrack object.  This may not be whats expected.
> > 
> > Should I make this change:
> > 
> > set_attr_connlabels(struct nf_conntrack *ct, const void *value, size_t len)
> > {
> > -  ct->connlabels = (void *) value;
> > +  ct->connlabels = nfct_bitmask_clone(value);
> > }
> > 
> > to avoid this or not?
> 
> To attach expectations to master conntracks, we pass the object via
> the setter without cloning it.

Oh? Sorry, I failed to spot that.  But perfect, so there is no need
to make this change.

> So my suggestion is to document how it works and leave it as is. BTW,
> make sure that object is released in the nfct_destroy path if you do
> so.

pushed to -next.

Thanks for your suggestions, i've added a doc-comment to
nfct_bitmask_destroy() about this.

  reply	other threads:[~2013-02-03 12:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-23 22:38 [PATCH 0/4] libnetfilter_conntrack: connlabel support Florian Westphal
2013-01-23 22:38 ` [PATCH 1/4] api: add nfct_bitmask object Florian Westphal
2013-01-23 22:38 ` [PATCH 2/4] api: add connlabel api and attribute Florian Westphal
2013-02-02 20:48   ` Florian Westphal
2013-02-03  9:59     ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2013-02-03 12:02       ` Florian Westphal [this message]
2013-01-23 22:38 ` [PATCH 3/4] examples: add connlabel dump/set/clear demo programs Florian Westphal
2013-01-23 22:38 ` [PATCH 4/4] api: add CTA_LABEL_MASK attribute handling Florian Westphal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130203120245.GA32074@breakpoint.cc \
    --to=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).