From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] NFQUEUE: add --queue-cpu-fanout parameter Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2013 13:26:32 +0200 Message-ID: <20130402112632.GA9386@localhost> References: <20130323200402.209591997@eitzenberger.org> <20130323200608.668651644@eitzenberger.org> <20130401232947.GA12381@localhost> <20130402103539.GF8327@imap.eitzenberger.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii To: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from mail.us.es ([193.147.175.20]:41551 "EHLO mail.us.es" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754312Ab3DBL0i (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Apr 2013 07:26:38 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130402103539.GF8327@imap.eitzenberger.org> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Holger, On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 12:35:39PM +0200, Holger Eitzenberger wrote: > Hi Pablo, > > > I think we have to add O_QUEUE_CPU_FANOUT here to make sure both > > queue-balance and queue-cpu-fanout are not used both incorrectly > > together. That also needs some code a new .x6_fcheck function to > > validate this. > > it is currently that --queue-cpu-fanout *requires* --queue-balance, as > the CPU fanout works on top of the balanced queues. > > Or possibly I miss your point. Forget it, your patch was just fine, sorry. > > Could you also send me the corresponding manpage update for this? > > Sorry for lacking that. > > I've respinned the 3/3 patch to include the man page update as well. Thanks! I have pushed this to the -next branch of iptables. Will merge by when 3.10-rc1 is released.