netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* documentation bug: missing nat targets in man
@ 2013-04-09  9:47 Mart Frauenlob
  2013-04-09  9:54 ` Patrick McHardy
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Mart Frauenlob @ 2013-04-09  9:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netfilter-devel

Hello,

I noticed there's quite new DNAT, SNAT, NETMAP support for ip6tables, 
but that information is missing in the man page.
Anything else needed than just copying the according ipv4 *.man files?
If so, want me do prepare a patch?

Best regards

Mart

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: documentation bug: missing nat targets in man
  2013-04-09  9:47 documentation bug: missing nat targets in man Mart Frauenlob
@ 2013-04-09  9:54 ` Patrick McHardy
  2013-04-09 11:40   ` Mart Frauenlob
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Patrick McHardy @ 2013-04-09  9:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mart Frauenlob; +Cc: netfilter-devel

On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 11:47:42AM +0200, Mart Frauenlob wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I noticed there's quite new DNAT, SNAT, NETMAP support for
> ip6tables, but that information is missing in the man page.
> Anything else needed than just copying the according ipv4 *.man files?
> If so, want me do prepare a patch?

I guess you can rename the ipv4 specific man files to xt_... and
update them accordingly, the modules should behave similar to their
IPv4 counterparts.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: documentation bug: missing nat targets in man
  2013-04-09  9:54 ` Patrick McHardy
@ 2013-04-09 11:40   ` Mart Frauenlob
  2013-04-10 11:26     ` Patrick McHardy
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Mart Frauenlob @ 2013-04-09 11:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Patrick McHardy; +Cc: netfilter-devel

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 825 bytes --]

On 09.04.2013 11:54, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 11:47:42AM +0200, Mart Frauenlob wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I noticed there's quite new DNAT, SNAT, NETMAP support for
>> ip6tables, but that information is missing in the man page.
>> Anything else needed than just copying the according ipv4 *.man files?
>> If so, want me do prepare a patch?
>
> I guess you can rename the ipv4 specific man files to xt_... and
> update them accordingly, the modules should behave similar to their
> IPv4 counterparts.
>

Ok, here it is.
I slightly modified the text in regards to sentence structure.
Removed the references to older kernels, as this does not apply to the 
new ipv6 version.
Added the list of valid protocols, which again - for me leaves the 
question about -p icmp open (re other mail).

Best regards

Mart

[-- Attachment #2: ip6tables-manpage-Add-DNAT-SNAT-and-NETMAP-targets.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3778 bytes --]

>From 003b833cb1a47c0e189ba3b275af4ab9dad4f25e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mart Frauenlob <mart.frauenlob@chello.at>
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 13:34:31 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] ip6tables manpage: Add DNAT, SNAT and NETMAP targets.

---
 extensions/libip6t_DNAT.man   |   30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 extensions/libip6t_NETMAP.man |    9 +++++++++
 extensions/libip6t_SNAT.man   |   28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 extensions/libip6t_DNAT.man
 create mode 100644 extensions/libip6t_NETMAP.man
 create mode 100644 extensions/libip6t_SNAT.man

diff --git a/extensions/libip6t_DNAT.man b/extensions/libip6t_DNAT.man
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..9ab07e2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/extensions/libip6t_DNAT.man
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+This target is only valid in the
+.B nat
+table, in the
+.B PREROUTING
+and
+.B OUTPUT
+chains, and user-defined chains which are only called from those
+chains.  It specifies that the destination address of the packet
+should be modified (and all future packets in this connection will
+also be mangled), and rules should cease being examined.  It takes the
+following options:
+.TP
+\fB\-\-to\-destination\fP [\fIipaddr\fP[\fB\-\fP\fIipaddr\fP]][\fB:\fP\fIport\fP[\fB\-\fP\fIport\fP]]
+which can specify a single new destination IP address, an inclusive
+range of IP addresses. Optionally a port range,
+if the rule also specifies one of the following protocols:
+.B tcp, udp, dccp, sctp
+or
+.B icmp\fP.
+If no port range is specified, then the destination port will never be
+modified. If no IP address is specified then only the destination port
+will be modified.
+.TP
+\fB\-\-random\fP
+If option
+\fB\-\-random\fP
+is used then port mapping will be randomized.
+.TP
+\fB\-\-persistent\fP
+Gives a client the same source-/destination-address for each connection.
diff --git a/extensions/libip6t_NETMAP.man b/extensions/libip6t_NETMAP.man
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..a7e90b8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/extensions/libip6t_NETMAP.man
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+This target allows you to statically map a whole network of addresses onto
+another network of addresses.  It can only be used from rules in the
+.B nat
+table.
+.TP
+\fB\-\-to\fP \fIaddress\fP[\fB/\fP\fImask\fP]
+Network address to map to.  The resulting address will be constructed in the
+following way: All 'one' bits in the mask are filled in from the new `address'.
+All bits that are zero in the mask are filled in from the original address.
diff --git a/extensions/libip6t_SNAT.man b/extensions/libip6t_SNAT.man
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..d5d4989
--- /dev/null
+++ b/extensions/libip6t_SNAT.man
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+This target is only valid in the
+.B nat
+table, in the
+.B POSTROUTING
+chain.  It specifies that the source address of the packet should be
+modified (and all future packets in this connection will also be
+mangled), and rules should cease being examined.  It takes the
+following options:
+.TP
+\fB\-\-to\-source\fP [\fIipaddr\fP[\fB\-\fP\fIipaddr\fP]][\fB:\fP\fIport\fP[\fB\-\fP\fIport\fP]]
+which can specify a single new source IP address, an inclusive range
+of IP addresses. Optionally a port range,
+if the rule also specifies one of the following protocols:
+.B tcp, udp, dccp, sctp
+or
+.B icmp\fP.
+If no port range is specified, then source ports below 512 will be
+mapped to other ports below 512: those between 512 and 1023 inclusive
+will be mapped to ports below 1024, and other ports will be mapped to
+1024 or above. Where possible, no port alteration will occur.
+.TP
+\fB\-\-random\fP
+If option
+\fB\-\-random\fP
+is used then port mapping will be randomized.
+.TP
+\fB\-\-persistent\fP
+Gives a client the same source-/destination-address for each connection.
-- 
1.7.2.5


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: documentation bug: missing nat targets in man
  2013-04-09 11:40   ` Mart Frauenlob
@ 2013-04-10 11:26     ` Patrick McHardy
  2013-04-10 12:53       ` Mart Frauenlob
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Patrick McHardy @ 2013-04-10 11:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mart Frauenlob; +Cc: netfilter-devel

On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 01:40:24PM +0200, Mart Frauenlob wrote:
> On 09.04.2013 11:54, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> >On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 11:47:42AM +0200, Mart Frauenlob wrote:
> >>Hello,
> >>
> >>I noticed there's quite new DNAT, SNAT, NETMAP support for
> >>ip6tables, but that information is missing in the man page.
> >>Anything else needed than just copying the according ipv4 *.man files?
> >>If so, want me do prepare a patch?
> >
> >I guess you can rename the ipv4 specific man files to xt_... and
> >update them accordingly, the modules should behave similar to their
> >IPv4 counterparts.
> >
> 
> Ok, here it is.
> I slightly modified the text in regards to sentence structure.
> Removed the references to older kernels, as this does not apply to
> the new ipv6 version.
> Added the list of valid protocols, which again - for me leaves the
> question about -p icmp open (re other mail).
> 
> Best regards
> 
> Mart

> >From 003b833cb1a47c0e189ba3b275af4ab9dad4f25e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Mart Frauenlob <mart.frauenlob@chello.at>
> Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 13:34:31 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] ip6tables manpage: Add DNAT, SNAT and NETMAP targets.
> 
> ---
>  extensions/libip6t_DNAT.man   |   30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  extensions/libip6t_NETMAP.man |    9 +++++++++
>  extensions/libip6t_SNAT.man   |   28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 extensions/libip6t_DNAT.man
>  create mode 100644 extensions/libip6t_NETMAP.man
>  create mode 100644 extensions/libip6t_SNAT.man

Well, my suggestion was to add one manpage which covers both the IPv4
and IPv6 targets since they're pretty much identical. I think just
adding a libxt_DNAT.man etc. should work.

> diff --git a/extensions/libip6t_DNAT.man b/extensions/libip6t_DNAT.man
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..9ab07e2
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/extensions/libip6t_DNAT.man
> @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
> +This target is only valid in the
> +.B nat
> +table, in the
> +.B PREROUTING
> +and
> +.B OUTPUT
> +chains, and user-defined chains which are only called from those
> +chains.  It specifies that the destination address of the packet
> +should be modified (and all future packets in this connection will
> +also be mangled), and rules should cease being examined.  It takes the
> +following options:
> +.TP
> +\fB\-\-to\-destination\fP [\fIipaddr\fP[\fB\-\fP\fIipaddr\fP]][\fB:\fP\fIport\fP[\fB\-\fP\fIport\fP]]
> +which can specify a single new destination IP address, an inclusive
> +range of IP addresses. Optionally a port range,
> +if the rule also specifies one of the following protocols:
> +.B tcp, udp, dccp, sctp
> +or
> +.B icmp\fP.
> +If no port range is specified, then the destination port will never be
> +modified. If no IP address is specified then only the destination port
> +will be modified.
> +.TP
> +\fB\-\-random\fP
> +If option
> +\fB\-\-random\fP
> +is used then port mapping will be randomized.
> +.TP
> +\fB\-\-persistent\fP
> +Gives a client the same source-/destination-address for each connection.
> diff --git a/extensions/libip6t_NETMAP.man b/extensions/libip6t_NETMAP.man
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..a7e90b8
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/extensions/libip6t_NETMAP.man
> @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
> +This target allows you to statically map a whole network of addresses onto
> +another network of addresses.  It can only be used from rules in the
> +.B nat
> +table.
> +.TP
> +\fB\-\-to\fP \fIaddress\fP[\fB/\fP\fImask\fP]
> +Network address to map to.  The resulting address will be constructed in the
> +following way: All 'one' bits in the mask are filled in from the new `address'.
> +All bits that are zero in the mask are filled in from the original address.
> diff --git a/extensions/libip6t_SNAT.man b/extensions/libip6t_SNAT.man
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..d5d4989
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/extensions/libip6t_SNAT.man
> @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
> +This target is only valid in the
> +.B nat
> +table, in the
> +.B POSTROUTING
> +chain.  It specifies that the source address of the packet should be
> +modified (and all future packets in this connection will also be
> +mangled), and rules should cease being examined.  It takes the
> +following options:
> +.TP
> +\fB\-\-to\-source\fP [\fIipaddr\fP[\fB\-\fP\fIipaddr\fP]][\fB:\fP\fIport\fP[\fB\-\fP\fIport\fP]]
> +which can specify a single new source IP address, an inclusive range
> +of IP addresses. Optionally a port range,
> +if the rule also specifies one of the following protocols:
> +.B tcp, udp, dccp, sctp
> +or
> +.B icmp\fP.
> +If no port range is specified, then source ports below 512 will be
> +mapped to other ports below 512: those between 512 and 1023 inclusive
> +will be mapped to ports below 1024, and other ports will be mapped to
> +1024 or above. Where possible, no port alteration will occur.
> +.TP
> +\fB\-\-random\fP
> +If option
> +\fB\-\-random\fP
> +is used then port mapping will be randomized.
> +.TP
> +\fB\-\-persistent\fP
> +Gives a client the same source-/destination-address for each connection.
> -- 
> 1.7.2.5
> 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: documentation bug: missing nat targets in man
  2013-04-10 11:26     ` Patrick McHardy
@ 2013-04-10 12:53       ` Mart Frauenlob
  2013-04-10 13:20         ` Patrick McHardy
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Mart Frauenlob @ 2013-04-10 12:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Patrick McHardy; +Cc: netfilter-devel

On 10.04.2013 13:26, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 01:40:24PM +0200, Mart Frauenlob wrote:
>> On 09.04.2013 11:54, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 11:47:42AM +0200, Mart Frauenlob wrote:
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> I noticed there's quite new DNAT, SNAT, NETMAP support for
>>>> ip6tables, but that information is missing in the man page.
>>>> Anything else needed than just copying the according ipv4 *.man files?
>>>> If so, want me do prepare a patch?
>>>
>>> I guess you can rename the ipv4 specific man files to xt_... and
>>> update them accordingly, the modules should behave similar to their
>>> IPv4 counterparts.
>>>
>>
>> Ok, here it is.
>> I slightly modified the text in regards to sentence structure.
>> Removed the references to older kernels, as this does not apply to
>> the new ipv6 version.
>> Added the list of valid protocols, which again - for me leaves the
>> question about -p icmp open (re other mail).

[...]
>> ---
>>   extensions/libip6t_DNAT.man   |   30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   extensions/libip6t_NETMAP.man |    9 +++++++++
>>   extensions/libip6t_SNAT.man   |   28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   3 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>   create mode 100644 extensions/libip6t_DNAT.man
>>   create mode 100644 extensions/libip6t_NETMAP.man
>>   create mode 100644 extensions/libip6t_SNAT.man
>
> Well, my suggestion was to add one manpage which covers both the IPv4
> and IPv6 targets since they're pretty much identical. I think just
> adding a libxt_DNAT.man etc. should work.

I've not yet tried to figure out where and what code is responsible for 
assembling all the *.man files together, but from what I see as the 
result and from what is there, like the LOG or MASQUERADE target are 
split up that way, actually producing redundant sections. Thats why I 
thought thats the way to go. Will try the libxt_*.man way...


As there's redundant stuff, I can also prepare patches to join that 
together. Wanted?

What about the -p icmp part?

Best regards

Mart


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: documentation bug: missing nat targets in man
  2013-04-10 12:53       ` Mart Frauenlob
@ 2013-04-10 13:20         ` Patrick McHardy
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Patrick McHardy @ 2013-04-10 13:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mart Frauenlob; +Cc: netfilter-devel

On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 02:53:52PM +0200, Mart Frauenlob wrote:
> On 10.04.2013 13:26, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> >On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 01:40:24PM +0200, Mart Frauenlob wrote:
> >>On 09.04.2013 11:54, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> >>>On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 11:47:42AM +0200, Mart Frauenlob wrote:
> >>>>Hello,
> >>>>
> >>>>I noticed there's quite new DNAT, SNAT, NETMAP support for
> >>>>ip6tables, but that information is missing in the man page.
> >>>>Anything else needed than just copying the according ipv4 *.man files?
> >>>>If so, want me do prepare a patch?
> >>>
> >>>I guess you can rename the ipv4 specific man files to xt_... and
> >>>update them accordingly, the modules should behave similar to their
> >>>IPv4 counterparts.
> >>>
> >>
> >>Ok, here it is.
> >>I slightly modified the text in regards to sentence structure.
> >>Removed the references to older kernels, as this does not apply to
> >>the new ipv6 version.
> >>Added the list of valid protocols, which again - for me leaves the
> >>question about -p icmp open (re other mail).
> 
> [...]
> >>---
> >>  extensions/libip6t_DNAT.man   |   30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>  extensions/libip6t_NETMAP.man |    9 +++++++++
> >>  extensions/libip6t_SNAT.man   |   28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>  3 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >>  create mode 100644 extensions/libip6t_DNAT.man
> >>  create mode 100644 extensions/libip6t_NETMAP.man
> >>  create mode 100644 extensions/libip6t_SNAT.man
> >
> >Well, my suggestion was to add one manpage which covers both the IPv4
> >and IPv6 targets since they're pretty much identical. I think just
> >adding a libxt_DNAT.man etc. should work.
> 
> I've not yet tried to figure out where and what code is responsible
> for assembling all the *.man files together, but from what I see as
> the result and from what is there, like the LOG or MASQUERADE target
> are split up that way, actually producing redundant sections. Thats
> why I thought thats the way to go. Will try the libxt_*.man way...

Thanks,

> As there's redundant stuff, I can also prepare patches to join that
> together. Wanted?

I guess that would make sense if the IPv4 and IPv6 parts are (nearly)
identical.

> What about the -p icmp part?

Not sure, I'd leave it as it is for now.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2013-04-10 13:20 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-04-09  9:47 documentation bug: missing nat targets in man Mart Frauenlob
2013-04-09  9:54 ` Patrick McHardy
2013-04-09 11:40   ` Mart Frauenlob
2013-04-10 11:26     ` Patrick McHardy
2013-04-10 12:53       ` Mart Frauenlob
2013-04-10 13:20         ` Patrick McHardy

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).