From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] - libxt_bpf: use correct shell term in man page
 description
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 02:16:50 +0200
Message-ID: <20130419001650.GA24191@localhost>
References: <51627C59.6010407@chello.at>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
To: Mart Frauenlob <mart.frauenlob@chello.at>
Return-path: <netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail.us.es ([193.147.175.20]:53428 "EHLO mail.us.es"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S967484Ab3DSAQz (ORCPT <rfc822;netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 18 Apr 2013 20:16:55 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <51627C59.6010407@chello.at>
Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org>

On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 10:14:17AM +0200, Mart Frauenlob wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> use 'command substitution' as correct shell term instead of 'backticks'.
> Also mention backquotes and `$()' form.

I have applied this change to clarify this:

diff --git a/extensions/libxt_bpf.man b/extensions/libxt_bpf.man
index 4120a23..3dd4830 100644
--- a/extensions/libxt_bpf.man
+++ b/extensions/libxt_bpf.man
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Match using Linux Socket Filter. Expects a BPF program
in decimal format. This
 is the format generated by the \fBnfbpf_compile\fP utility.
 .TP
 \fB\-\-bytecode\fP \fIcode\fP
-Pass the code in backtick format as argument.
+Pass the BPF bytes code format (described in the example below).
 .PP
 The code format is similar to the output of the tcpdump -ddd command: one line
 that stores the number of instructions, followed by one line for each

> btw: After compiling in the git directory the nfbpf_compile binary
> is shown as new file by git. Should that be so?

I have also fixed this.

Regards.