From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] Revert: add new libnetfilter_queue API for libmnl
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 09:32:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130426073239.GD32324@breakpoint.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130426013601.GA4510@localhost>
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 12:43:28PM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote:
> > This is a partial revert of a0c885ae5a79457aa592cb70c27a7dee619762a4
> >
> > Specifically, it removes the header linux/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.h
> > added in that commit.
>
> The idea for caching that file header is to make sure
> libnetfilter_queue compiles out of the box, without external linux
> kernel headers installed in the system. The idea is to make sure the
> libraries compilation does not break in case there's an old library
> header installed in the system.
>
> > 1), there is already a /usr/include/linux/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.h,
> > which is part of the linux kernel API
>
> As said, that file may not be available or may be stale.
Yes, but at this time the system-wide header is used, and not this copy.
Compile of libnetfilter_queue breaks with the other patches applied
because the new attribute is missing from the system header.
> > 2), we already have
> > include/libnetfilter_queue/linux_nfnetlink_queue.h
>
> That was added initially for the old libnetfilter_queue API, I'd like
> to get rid of it. It's currently being installed and it results in
> (very likely) two duplicated headers in the system (the one from the
> linux kernel headers and this one from libnetfilter_queue).
Hrm, yes. I thought that was intentional.
Or are you saying that you basically just want to rename
linux_nfnetlink_queue.h and carry a copy of nfnetlink_queue.h instead?
> Once the old API is deprecated (we should do that anytime soon), we
> can get finally rid of linux_nfnetlink_queue.h
I guess what confused me is that there is nothing related to the old
api in that header, so we might as well keep it?
> > which contains the same definitions/structures/macros, so it makes
> > little sense to have two headers in libnetfilter_queue that share
> > almost their entire content.
> >
> > [ worse, the nfnetlink_queue.h header reverted here actually is
> > incompatible with mainline kernels, since a few defines have the
> > wrong value ... ]
>
> Then, please refresh it.
Alright, but its not enough; the build system would require
additional treatment to give precedence to that header when compiling
the library.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-26 7:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-25 10:43 [PATCH 0/4] libnetfilter_queue: gso handling support Florian Westphal
2013-04-25 10:43 ` [PATCH 1/4] Revert: add new libnetfilter_queue API for libmnl Florian Westphal
2013-04-26 1:36 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2013-04-26 7:32 ` Florian Westphal [this message]
2013-04-26 9:37 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2013-04-26 10:02 ` Florian Westphal
2013-04-26 10:12 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2013-04-26 10:30 ` Florian Westphal
2013-04-25 10:43 ` [PATCH 2/4] examples/nf-queue: handle recv error, use larger buffer Florian Westphal
2013-04-26 1:42 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2013-04-26 7:27 ` Florian Westphal
2013-04-25 10:43 ` [PATCH 3/4] src: add new GSO handling capabilities Florian Westphal
2013-04-25 10:43 ` [PATCH 4/4] examples/nf-queue: receive large gso packets Florian Westphal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130426073239.GD32324@breakpoint.cc \
--to=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).