netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] Revert: add new libnetfilter_queue API for libmnl
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 09:32:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130426073239.GD32324@breakpoint.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130426013601.GA4510@localhost>

Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 12:43:28PM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote:
> > This is a partial revert of a0c885ae5a79457aa592cb70c27a7dee619762a4
> > 
> > Specifically, it removes the header linux/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.h
> > added in that commit.
> 
> The idea for caching that file header is to make sure
> libnetfilter_queue compiles out of the box, without external linux
> kernel headers installed in the system. The idea is to make sure the
> libraries compilation does not break in case there's an old library
> header installed in the system.
> 
> > 1), there is already a /usr/include/linux/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.h,
> >     which is part of the linux kernel API
> 
> As said, that file may not be available or may be stale.

Yes, but at this time the system-wide header is used, and not this copy.
Compile of libnetfilter_queue breaks with the other patches applied
because the new attribute is missing from the system header.

> > 2), we already have
> >     include/libnetfilter_queue/linux_nfnetlink_queue.h
> 
> That was added initially for the old libnetfilter_queue API, I'd like
> to get rid of it. It's currently being installed and it results in
> (very likely) two duplicated headers in the system (the one from the
> linux kernel headers and this one from libnetfilter_queue).

Hrm, yes.  I thought that was intentional.
Or are you saying that you basically just want to rename
linux_nfnetlink_queue.h and carry a copy of nfnetlink_queue.h instead?

> Once the old API is deprecated (we should do that anytime soon), we
> can get finally rid of linux_nfnetlink_queue.h

I guess what confused me is that there is nothing related to the old
api in that header, so we might as well keep it?

> > which contains the same definitions/structures/macros, so it makes
> > little sense to have two headers in libnetfilter_queue that share
> > almost their entire content.
> > 
> > [ worse, the nfnetlink_queue.h header reverted here actually is
> > incompatible with mainline kernels, since a few defines have the
> > wrong value ... ]
> 
> Then, please refresh it.

Alright, but its not enough; the build system would require
additional treatment to give precedence to that header when compiling
the library.

  reply	other threads:[~2013-04-26  7:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-25 10:43 [PATCH 0/4] libnetfilter_queue: gso handling support Florian Westphal
2013-04-25 10:43 ` [PATCH 1/4] Revert: add new libnetfilter_queue API for libmnl Florian Westphal
2013-04-26  1:36   ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2013-04-26  7:32     ` Florian Westphal [this message]
2013-04-26  9:37       ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2013-04-26 10:02         ` Florian Westphal
2013-04-26 10:12           ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2013-04-26 10:30             ` Florian Westphal
2013-04-25 10:43 ` [PATCH 2/4] examples/nf-queue: handle recv error, use larger buffer Florian Westphal
2013-04-26  1:42   ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2013-04-26  7:27     ` Florian Westphal
2013-04-25 10:43 ` [PATCH 3/4] src: add new GSO handling capabilities Florian Westphal
2013-04-25 10:43 ` [PATCH 4/4] examples/nf-queue: receive large gso packets Florian Westphal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130426073239.GD32324@breakpoint.cc \
    --to=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).