netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] netfilter: move skb_gso_segment into nfnetlink_queue module
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2013 19:46:18 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130427174618.GB4891@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1366383507-16633-4-git-send-email-fw@strlen.de>

On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 04:58:25PM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote:
> There is nothing wrong with the current code.
> 
> However, skb_gso_segment is expensive, so it would be nice
> if we could avoid it in the future.
> 
> Since userspace must be prepared to receive larger-than-mtu-packets
> (which will also have incorrect l3/l4 checksums), we cannot simply
> remove it.
> 
> The plan is to add a per-queue feature flag that userspace can
> set when binding the queue.
> 
> The problem is that in nf_queue, we only have a queue number,
> not the queue context/configuration settings.
> 
> This patch should have no impact other than the skb_gso_segment
> call now being in a function that has access to the queue config data.
> 
> The size new size attribute in nf_queue_entry is needed so
> nfnetlink_queue can duplicate the entry of the gso skb
> when segmenting the skb while also copying the route key.
> 
> Next step: avoid skb_gso_segment when queue config says so.

Applied, thanks.

  reply	other threads:[~2013-04-27 17:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-19 14:58 [PATCH -next v2 0/5] netfilter: nf_queue: avoid expensive gso/checksums Florian Westphal
2013-04-19 14:58 ` [PATCH 1/5] netfilter: nf_queue: move device refcount bump to extra function Florian Westphal
2013-04-27 17:46   ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2013-04-19 14:58 ` [PATCH 2/5] netfilter: nfnetlink_queue: avoid peer_portid test Florian Westphal
2013-04-26  1:19   ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2013-04-19 14:58 ` [PATCH 3/5] netfilter: move skb_gso_segment into nfnetlink_queue module Florian Westphal
2013-04-27 17:46   ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2013-04-19 14:58 ` [PATCH 4/5] netfilter: nfnetlink_queue: add skb info attribute Florian Westphal
2013-04-27 17:46   ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2013-04-19 14:58 ` [PATCH 5/5] netfilter: nfqueue: avoid expensive gso segmentation and checksum fixup Florian Westphal
2013-04-27 17:46   ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-04-16 15:32 [PATCH -next 0/5] netfilter: nf_queue: avoid expensive gso/checksumming Florian Westphal
2013-04-16 15:32 ` [PATCH 3/5] netfilter: move skb_gso_segment into nfnetlink_queue module Florian Westphal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130427174618.GB4891@localhost \
    --to=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).