From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: xt_addrtype limit-iface-in is broken for ipv6
Date: Tue, 7 May 2013 11:48:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130507094806.GA20003@breakpoint.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130507004606.GA5088@localhost>
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org> wrote:
> > Because xt_addrtype uses ip6_route_output, the ipv6 routing
> > implementation creates an unwanted cached entry, and the packet
> > won't make it to the real/expected destination.
> >
> > Silently ignoring --limit-iface-in makes the routing work
> > but it breaks rule matching (--dst-type LOCAL with limit-iface-in
> > is supposed to only match if the dst address is configured on
> > the incoming interface; without --limit-iface-in it will match if
> > the address is reachable via lo).
> >
> > AFAIU the only solution is to use ipv6_chk_addr() when
> > LOCAL is requested instead of a route lookup.
> >
> > Since this would create a dependeny on ipv6 its a no-go.
> > So, it boils down to two possible solutions:
> >
> > a), extend struct nf_afinfo to also register
> > ipv6_chk_addr(), OR
> > b), revert the commit that moved ipt_addrtype to xt_addrtype,
> > and keep the ipv6 code in ip6t_addrtype.
>
> I'd prefer something smaller so I can pass a fix to -stable. We
> cannot pass patches bigger than 100 lines including context.
This will be tough. Extending struct nf_afinfo for
ipv6_chk_addr MIGHT come in just under 100 lines. I'll have go at this.
[ i don't like this solution because we add a something for the sake
of a single ipv6 special case ].
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-07 9:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-05 9:36 xt_addrtype limit-iface-in is broken for ipv6 Florian Westphal
2013-05-07 0:46 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2013-05-07 9:48 ` Florian Westphal [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130507094806.GA20003@breakpoint.cc \
--to=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).