From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Phil Oester Subject: Re: [PATCH] ip6tables: don't print out /128 Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2013 21:19:08 -0700 Message-ID: <20130708041908.GA5532@linuxace.com> References: <20130620201138.GA11634@gmail.com> <20130708022641.GA14090@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org To: Pablo Neira Ayuso Return-path: Received: from mail-pa0-f51.google.com ([209.85.220.51]:60394 "EHLO mail-pa0-f51.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753404Ab3GHETI (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Jul 2013 00:19:08 -0400 Received: by mail-pa0-f51.google.com with SMTP id lf11so3950113pab.10 for ; Sun, 07 Jul 2013 21:19:08 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130708022641.GA14090@localhost> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 04:26:41AM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > I just look at the source of old iptables releases (1.4.11) and it > displays the /32 with iptables -L. I prefer if we restore that > behaviour, ie. we get it back to display /32, for historial reasons. That does not appear to be correct. # ./iptables-multi main -V iptables v1.4.10 # ./iptables-multi main -L foo Chain foo (0 references) target prot opt source destination all -- 1.2.3.4 anywhere >>From what I can tell, the comment /* we don't want to see "/32" */ has existed in the tree since at least 3/2000. Phil