From: Phil Oester <kernel@linuxace.com>
To: "Laurence J. Lane" <ljlane@debian.org>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: state match incompatibilty across versions
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2013 15:33:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130806223354.GA20287@linuxace.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+0KVf2e_Ce33SFJyK21LzLBhUhWzWdgaMje4ShZF7i7evGuMw@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 02:23:44PM -0400, Laurence J. Lane wrote:
> Debian Bug#718810 reports a problem with the state match across
> iptables versions. The following rules were created with the same
> states using 1.4.14. The state information on the state match do now
> show with 1.4.19.1's iptables-save or " iptables -L". The conntrack
> match's ctstate works as expected with the upgrade.
Can't seem to reproduce the problem here:
# /usr/local/ipt1414/sbin/iptables -V
iptables v1.4.14
# /usr/local/ipt1414/sbin/iptables -A foo -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT
# /usr/local/ipt1414/sbin/iptables -nvL foo
Chain foo (0 references)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
0 0 ACCEPT all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state RELATED,ESTABLISHED
# /usr/local/iptables/sbin/iptables -V
iptables v1.4.19.1
# /usr/local/iptables/sbin/iptables -nvL foo
Chain foo (0 references)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
0 0 ACCEPT all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state RELATED,ESTABLISHED
Perhaps kernel revision sensitive?
Phil
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-06 22:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-06 18:23 state match incompatibilty across versions Laurence J. Lane
2013-08-06 20:35 ` Laurence J. Lane
2013-08-06 22:33 ` Phil Oester [this message]
2013-08-08 1:28 ` Laurence J. Lane
2013-08-08 4:32 ` Phil Oester
2013-08-08 13:53 ` Laurence J. Lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130806223354.GA20287@linuxace.com \
--to=kernel@linuxace.com \
--cc=ljlane@debian.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).