From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Tomasz Bursztyka <tomasz.bursztyka@linux.intel.com>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [iptables-nftables PATCH 0/5] Centralizes rule parsing
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 20:58:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130820185813.GA11790@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1376913846-15996-1-git-send-email-tomasz.bursztyka@linux.intel.com>
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 03:04:01PM +0300, Tomasz Bursztyka wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here are the patches that refactors how rules are parsed. So now it's done in one unique place for all operations.
>
> And it adds a function to reset the counters with -Z since it's trivial to do so with such parsing strategy.
>
> Tomasz Bursztyka (5):
> nft: Parse fully and properly at once a rule into a cs
> nft: Refactor firewall printing so it reuses already parsed cs struct
> nft: Refactor rule deletion so it compares both cs structure
> xtables: nft: Complete refactoring on how rules are saved
I have collapsed these four patches in one single, we need that the
repository remains consistent between patches, that includes that new
functions need to have a client in the same patch.
The patch that I applied includes several things that I manually
fixed.
* IPv6 address printing was not working.
* Remove -4/-6 from the xtables-save output, we need exactly the same
output like iptables-save. It is only shown in xtables-events.
* Fix match/target aliasing, this one was not so obvious, as it's a
relatively new thing.
* Some coding style issue, this is prefered:
function(a, b, c, d,
e, f, g);
rather than:
function(a, b, c, d,
e, f, g);
I like that we saved 300 LOC with this. I have also applied one patch
to fix the wrong interpretation of the flags with IPv6.
> nft: Add a function to reset the counters of an existing rule
Also applied this one.
Thanks.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-20 18:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-19 12:04 [iptables-nftables PATCH 0/5] Centralizes rule parsing Tomasz Bursztyka
2013-08-19 12:04 ` [iptables-nftables PATCH 1/5] nft: Parse fully and properly at once a rule into a cs Tomasz Bursztyka
2013-08-19 12:04 ` [iptables-nftables PATCH 2/5] nft: Refactor firewall printing so it reuses already parsed cs struct Tomasz Bursztyka
2013-08-19 12:04 ` [iptables-nftables PATCH 3/5] nft: Refactor rule deletion so it compares both cs structure Tomasz Bursztyka
2013-08-19 12:04 ` [iptables-nftables PATCH 4/5] xtables: nft: Complete refactoring on how rules are saved Tomasz Bursztyka
2013-08-19 12:04 ` [iptables-nftables PATCH 5/5] nft: Add a function to reset the counters of an existing rule Tomasz Bursztyka
2013-08-20 18:58 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130820185813.GA11790@localhost \
--to=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tomasz.bursztyka@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).