From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Tom Herbert <therbert@google.com>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <jbrouer@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 nf-next] netfilter: conntrack: remove the central spinlock
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 00:28:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130826222844.GA19478@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1369244868.3301.343.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Hi Eric,
Several comments on the expectation side.
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 10:47:48AM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
[...]
>diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
>index 0283bae..c0823b9 100644
>--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
>+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
[...]
> @@ -196,6 +247,47 @@ clean_from_lists(struct nf_conn *ct)
> nf_ct_remove_expectations(ct);
With this patch, we hold the conntrack lock when calling
clean_from_lists but I think that's not enough.
nf_conntrack_expect_lock spinlock protection is missing here.
> }
[...]
> @@ -820,39 +930,41 @@ init_conntrack(struct net *net, struct nf_conn *tmpl,
> ecache ? ecache->expmask : 0,
> GFP_ATOMIC);
>
> - spin_lock_bh(&nf_conntrack_lock);
> - exp = nf_ct_find_expectation(net, zone, tuple);
> - if (exp) {
> - pr_debug("conntrack: expectation arrives ct=%p exp=%p\n",
> - ct, exp);
> - /* Welcome, Mr. Bond. We've been expecting you... */
> - __set_bit(IPS_EXPECTED_BIT, &ct->status);
> - ct->master = exp->master;
> - if (exp->helper) {
> - help = nf_ct_helper_ext_add(ct, exp->helper,
> - GFP_ATOMIC);
> - if (help)
> - rcu_assign_pointer(help->helper, exp->helper);
> - }
> + local_bh_disable();
> + if (net->ct.expect_count) {
> + spin_lock(&nf_conntrack_expect_lock);
I also think we have a possible race for expected conntracks. The
problem is that expectations don't bump the refcount of the master
conntrack.
> + exp = nf_ct_find_expectation(net, zone, tuple);
... Now that we have independent locks for conntrack and expectation
lists, a packet may match an expectation while another CPU is walking
through the nf_ct_delete_from_lists bits using exp->master as input.
> + if (exp) {
> + pr_debug("conntrack: expectation arrives ct=%p exp=%p\n",
> + ct, exp);
> + /* Welcome, Mr. Bond. We've been expecting you... */
> + __set_bit(IPS_EXPECTED_BIT, &ct->status);
> + ct->master = exp->master;
Then, ct->master points to the (vanished) conntrack.
> + if (exp->helper) {
> + help = nf_ct_helper_ext_add(ct, exp->helper,
> + GFP_ATOMIC);
> + if (help)
> + rcu_assign_pointer(help->helper, exp->helper);
> + }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_MARK
> - ct->mark = exp->master->mark;
> + ct->mark = exp->master->mark;
> #endif
> #ifdef CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_SECMARK
> - ct->secmark = exp->master->secmark;
> + ct->secmark = exp->master->secmark;
> #endif
> - nf_conntrack_get(&ct->master->ct_general);
> - NF_CT_STAT_INC(net, expect_new);
> - } else {
> + nf_conntrack_get(&ct->master->ct_general);
So this needs to adjust the refcounting logic for expectations, to
bump it earlier, during the expectation insertion.
Regards.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-26 22:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-09 3:04 [PATCH nf-next] netfilter: conntrack: remove the central spinlock Eric Dumazet
2013-05-09 5:43 ` Cong Wang
2013-05-09 6:01 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-05-09 7:46 ` Cong Wang
2013-05-09 13:46 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-05-22 17:47 ` [PATCH v2 " Eric Dumazet
2013-05-22 18:20 ` Joe Perches
2013-05-22 19:26 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-05-22 19:57 ` Joe Perches
2013-05-22 20:16 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-05-22 20:38 ` Joe Perches
2013-05-22 20:48 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-05-22 21:12 ` Joe Perches
2013-05-22 21:29 ` David Miller
2013-05-22 21:34 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-05-24 13:16 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2013-05-24 13:51 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-05-27 12:33 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2013-05-27 12:36 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2013-08-23 14:42 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2013-08-26 22:28 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130826222844.GA19478@localhost \
--to=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=jbrouer@redhat.com \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=therbert@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).