From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso Subject: Re: [nftables-kernel PATCH] netfilter: nf_tables: Fixes how a table is checked to be in use Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2013 12:48:32 +0200 Message-ID: <20130904104832.GA8799@localhost> References: <1377855812-15251-1-git-send-email-tomasz.bursztyka@linux.intel.com> <20130830223705.GA9864@localhost> <5225E354.4090000@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org To: Tomasz Bursztyka Return-path: Received: from mail.us.es ([193.147.175.20]:57094 "EHLO mail.us.es" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753790Ab3IDKsj (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Sep 2013 06:48:39 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5225E354.4090000@linux.intel.com> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 04:25:40PM +0300, Tomasz Bursztyka wrote: [...] > What's the use case for it? I mean: knowing that the table is in > use, I can see some use case (and it could be done much simpler). > The number of chains, not really. At least right now, nothing is > using it so what could be the future need for that? > Same for chains actually. We need that use counter for iptables-nftables for chains. See xtables -L for non-base chains.