From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, Anand Raj Manickam <anandrm@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH nft] src: add support for interface wildcard name
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 12:39:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131016103949.GA10032@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1381846993-30093-1-git-send-email-fw@strlen.de>
Hi Florian,
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 04:23:13PM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote:
> Uses same syntax as iptables: itfname+.
Good you're bringing up this issue, we've been discussing this for a
while with recent Anand's patch.
> The '+' suffix is not stored on the kernel side; this approach
> is the same as the one used by iptables-nftables.
Hm, it seems current iptables-nftables seems broken by:
73ea1cc nft: convert rule into a command state structure
So let's have a look at the previous handling we had (which is the one
I guess you're refering to):
ifname_ptr = nft_rule_expr_get(e, NFT_EXPR_CMP_DATA, &len);
memcpy(ifname, ifname_ptr, len);
ifname[len] = '\0';
/* if this is zero, then assume this is a interface */
if (if_nametoindex(ifname) == 0) {
ifname[len] = '+';
ifname[len+1] = '\0';
}
That if_nametoindex handling was a bit of cheat: if the interface is
gone after adding the rule, it will attach the '+', which is wrong.
> +static void ifname_type_print(const struct expr *expr)
> +{
> + unsigned int len = div_round_up(expr->len, BITS_PER_BYTE);
> + char data[len];
> +
> + mpz_export_data(data, expr->value, BYTEORDER_HOST_ENDIAN, len);
> + printf("\"%.*s", len, data);
> + if (len && data[len-1] != '\0')
> + printf("+"); /* string without nul: interface wildcard match */
> + printf("\"");
> +}
Your assumption regarding trailing nul looks similar to what I can see
in iptables, let's go that way in iptables-nftables.
> i.e. xtables-save understands 'nft .. meta oifname foo+' and vice versa.
>
> Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
> ---
> Caveats:
> - I am not convinced '+' is a good idea -- it is ambiguous since
> 'foo+' is a legal interface name.
I think we can remove the '+' in nft, so we match exactly what we
pass for the ifname case, eg. iifname "eth".
OK with this approach?
> Maybe we should use 'foo/' (Linux forbids / in interface names) instead?
> - added a new 'itfname' data type since I felt uncomfortable
> with allowing 'non-nul-terminated' strings.
> - removes a FIXME in netlink_delinearize. What was that about? :-}
I don't remember the reason for that case, please try to dig it out
from the history. Thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-16 10:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-15 14:23 [RFC PATCH nft] src: add support for interface wildcard name Florian Westphal
2013-10-16 10:39 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2013-10-16 11:00 ` Florian Westphal
2013-10-16 11:02 ` Patrick McHardy
2013-10-16 12:58 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2013-10-16 13:01 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2013-10-16 13:18 ` Anand Raj Manickam
2013-10-20 11:49 ` Jan Engelhardt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131016103949.GA10032@localhost \
--to=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=anandrm@gmail.com \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).