From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ipvs: avoid rcu_barrier during netns cleanup
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 10:11:42 +0200
Message-ID: <20131017081142.GA5324@localhost>
References: <1381802507-7934-1-git-send-email-horms@verge.net.au>
 <1381802507-7934-3-git-send-email-horms@verge.net.au>
 <20131016104306.GA10288@localhost>
 <alpine.LFD.2.03.1310162231380.1917@ssi.bg>
 <20131017004939.GB21728@verge.net.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>, lvs-devel@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org,
	Wensong Zhang <wensong@linux-vs.org>
To: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
Return-path: <lvs-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20131017004939.GB21728@verge.net.au>
Sender: lvs-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 09:49:39AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 10:52:14PM +0300, Julian Anastasov wrote:
> > 
> > 	Hello,
> > 
> > On Wed, 16 Oct 2013, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> > 
> > > I can enqueue this fix to nf if you like. No need to resend, I can
> > > manually apply.
> > > 
> > > Let me know.
> > 
> > 	It is not critical. I waited weeks the net tree to be
> > copied into net-next because it collides with the recent
> > "ipvs: make the service replacement more robust" change in
> > net tree :) But if a rcu_barrier in the netns cleanup looks
> > scary enough you can push it to nf. IMHO, it just adds
> > unneeded delay there.
> 
> If it is not critical I would prefer for it to travel through
> nf-next. Though I do not feel strongly about this.

Will enqueue for nf-next.

I'd appreciate if you can recover the tradition of attaching a short
evaluation in the cover letter as I do when I send pull requests to
David. Thanks!