From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] netfilter: nft: add queue module Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 12:39:18 +0100 Message-ID: <20131204113918.GA13246@localhost> References: <20131130122657.GG2067@breakpoint.cc> <1385824444-4506-1-git-send-email-eric@regit.org> <20131204110021.GA11380@localhost> <20131204113143.GC2767@breakpoint.cc> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Eric Leblond , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org To: Florian Westphal Return-path: Received: from mail.us.es ([193.147.175.20]:46349 "EHLO mail.us.es" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753592Ab3LDLjY (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Dec 2013 06:39:24 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131204113143.GC2767@breakpoint.cc> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 12:31:43PM +0100, Florian Westphal wrote: > Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > > > + while (jhash_initval == 0) > > > + jhash_initval = prandom_u32(); > > > > Different initialization approach with regards to xt_NFQUEUE, any > > reason for that change? > > I suggested this -- get_random_bytes is overkill for nfqueue > purposes. > > In fact, I think xt_NFQUEUE should be switched to prandom interface > as well. I see. For consistency, it would be good to get a patch so both are in sync.