From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: nftables/libnftables packages for Fedora Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 00:18:26 +0000 Message-ID: <20140113001826.GC3251@macbook.localnet> References: <20140112134024.2475a4f2@voldemort.scrye.com> <20140112170549.327dd807@voldemort.scrye.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Arturo Borrero Gonzalez , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org To: Kevin Fenzi Return-path: Received: from stinky.trash.net ([213.144.137.162]:51479 "EHLO stinky.trash.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750899AbaAMASa (ORCPT ); Sun, 12 Jan 2014 19:18:30 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140112170549.327dd807@voldemort.scrye.com> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 05:05:49PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > [ re-sending as I forgot to cc the list ] > > On Sun, 12 Jan 2014 22:16:35 +0100 > Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote: > > ...snip... > > > There is a patch from me to address this: > > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/304866/ > > Feel free to test it and comment. > > > > I have the same issue in the Debian land. I applied the patch locally > > in the package as a workaround. > > > > The patch is not applied yet to upstream. > > Cool. > > That addresses the part of the issue where the interpreter isn't fully > specified, but still the question is if these are config files that > users are expected to modify or are noarch scripts provided by the > package that are expected to be read-only (ie, /etc vs /usr/share)? Yes, they are basically noarch scripts providing defaults for the table configurations.