netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] netfilter: ctnetlink: force null nat binding on insert
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 11:58:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140217105856.GA16361@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140217104511.GB31125@breakpoint.cc>

On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 11:45:11AM +0100, Florian Westphal wrote:
> Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org> wrote:
> > >  static int
> > > +nfnetlink_attach_null_binding(struct nf_conn *ct,
> > > +			      enum nf_nat_manip_type manip)
> > > +{
> > > +	int ret = -EAGAIN;
> > > +	bool can_alloc;
> > > +
> > > +	/* This looks bogus, but its important.
> > > +	 *
> > > +	 * We cannot be sure that L3 NAT is available.
> > > +	 *
> > > +	 * If it is not, we will oops in nf_nat_setup_info when we try
> > > +	 * to fetch the l4 nat protocol (which would be on top of the l3 one).
> > > +	 *
> > > +	 * Normally nf_nat_setup_info cannot be called without L3 nat
> > > +	 * available, but this function is invoked from ctnetlink.
> > > +	 */
> > > +	rcu_read_lock();
> > > +
> > > +	can_alloc = !!__nf_nat_l3proto_find(nf_ct_l3num(ct));
> > > +	if (can_alloc)
> > > +		ret = __nf_nat_alloc_null_binding(ct, manip);
> > > +
> > > +	rcu_read_unlock();
> > > +	return ret;
> >
> > I think we should always do the module autoloading for nf-nat and
> > nf-nat-ipvX modules depending on nf_ct_l3num(ct), then return EAGAIN
> > to give another retry. Now, this needs to happen in any case, not only
> > when calling ctnetlink_parse_nat_setup().
>
> Not sure what you mean.  If we enter nf_nat_setup_info without ctnetlink
> involvement the nf-nat protocol should already be there (else, how can
> we end up in nf_nat_setup_info? NAT/MASQUERADE depends on nf-nat).
>
> What use-case did you have in mind? (or, to put it differently, where
> do you think the module probing logic should be)?

If __nf_nat_l3proto_find returns NULL before trying to attach the null
binding, I think you should call the routine to autoload the modules
before returning EAGAIN.

        proto = __nf_nat_l3proto_find(nf_ct_l3num(ct));
        if (proto == NULL) {
                ... release locks
                request_module(...);
                ... acquire locks again
                return -EAGAIN;
        }

  reply	other threads:[~2014-02-17 10:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-02-16 11:15 [PATCH V2] netfilter: ctnetlink: force null nat binding on insert Florian Westphal
2014-02-17 10:37 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2014-02-17 10:45   ` Florian Westphal
2014-02-17 10:58     ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2014-02-17 11:15       ` Florian Westphal
2014-02-17 13:24         ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2014-02-17 13:32           ` Florian Westphal
2014-02-18  1:14             ` Pablo Neira Ayuso

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140217105856.GA16361@localhost \
    --to=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).