From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: brouer@redhat.com
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@gmail.com,
pablo@netfilter.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, fw@strlen.de,
kaber@trash.net
Subject: Re: [nf-next PATCH V2 0/5] netfilter: conntrack: optimization, remove central spinlock
Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2014 20:14:08 -0500 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140302.201408.1852916497663090292.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140228121529.20347.38300.stgit@dragon>
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 13:16:15 +0100
> This patchset change the conntrack locking and provides a huge
> performance improvements.
I no longer have any concerns, looks good to me.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-03 1:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-27 18:23 [nf-next PATCH 0/5] (repost) netfilter: conntrack: optimization, remove central spinlock Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-02-27 18:23 ` [nf-next PATCH 1/5] netfilter: trivial code cleanup and doc changes Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-02-27 18:23 ` [nf-next PATCH 2/5] netfilter: conntrack: spinlock per cpu to protect special lists Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-02-27 18:23 ` [nf-next PATCH 3/5] netfilter: avoid race with exp->master ct Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-02-27 21:34 ` Florian Westphal
2014-02-28 11:30 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-02-27 18:23 ` [nf-next PATCH 4/5] netfilter: conntrack: seperate expect locking from nf_conntrack_lock Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-02-27 18:23 ` [nf-next PATCH 5/5] netfilter: conntrack: remove central spinlock nf_conntrack_lock Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-02-27 23:34 ` [nf-next PATCH 0/5] (repost) netfilter: conntrack: optimization, remove central spinlock David Miller
2014-02-28 9:47 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-02-28 12:16 ` [nf-next PATCH V2 0/5] " Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-02-28 12:16 ` [nf-next PATCH V2 1/5] netfilter: trivial code cleanup and doc changes Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-02-28 12:17 ` [nf-next PATCH V2 2/5] netfilter: conntrack: spinlock per cpu to protect special lists Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-02-28 12:17 ` [nf-next PATCH V2 3/5] netfilter: avoid race with exp->master ct Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-02-28 12:17 ` [nf-next PATCH V2 4/5] netfilter: conntrack: seperate expect locking from nf_conntrack_lock Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-02-28 15:08 ` Florian Westphal
2014-03-03 11:33 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-02-28 12:17 ` [nf-next PATCH V2 5/5] netfilter: conntrack: remove central spinlock nf_conntrack_lock Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-03-03 1:14 ` David Miller [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140302.201408.1852916497663090292.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=brouer@redhat.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).