netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: rgb@redhat.com
Cc: linux-audit@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	eparis@redhat.com, sgrubb@redhat.com, hadi@mojatatu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH][v5] netlink: have netlink per-protocol bind function return an error code.
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 15:52:58 -0400 (EDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140326.155258.685120737486107362.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5bf7c2b8ad25b31bb34ae00f5fe6ec7f5d653f4b.1395693533.git.rgb@redhat.com>

From: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 16:59:23 -0400

> +				if (err)
> +					if (!nlk->portid)
> +						netlink_remove(sk);
> +					for (int undo = 0; undo < i; undo++)
> +						if (nlk->netlink_unbind)
> +							nlk->netlink_unbind(undo);
> +					return err;

Take a good long stare at that code block for a while.

Looks like you forgot the braces to delineate the code block.

This also means you really haven't tested this patch :-)

Please also DO NOT declare local variables in a for() statement,
this is not c++.

  reply	other threads:[~2014-03-26 19:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-03-21 16:39 [PATCH] netlink: have netlink per-protocol bind function return an error code Richard Guy Briggs
2014-03-23  4:50 ` David Miller
2014-03-24 14:38   ` Richard Guy Briggs
2014-03-24 18:34     ` Richard Guy Briggs
2014-03-24 18:35       ` [PATCH][v3] " Richard Guy Briggs
2014-03-24 19:37         ` [PATCH][v4] " Richard Guy Briggs
2014-03-24 20:59       ` [PATCH][v5] " Richard Guy Briggs
2014-03-26 19:52         ` David Miller [this message]
2014-03-26 20:09           ` v6 superceded it [was: Re: [PATCH][v5] netlink: have netlink per-protocol bind function return an error code.] Richard Guy Briggs
2014-03-25 12:50       ` [PATCH][v6] netlink: have netlink per-protocol bind function return an error code Richard Guy Briggs
2014-03-26 20:46         ` David Miller
2014-03-26 23:13         ` Patrick McHardy
2014-03-25 13:11       ` unbind [was: Re: [PATCH] netlink: have netlink per-protocol bind function return] " Richard Guy Briggs
2014-04-01 14:14       ` [PATCH 0/3] netlink: per-protocol bind fixup/enhancement set Richard Guy Briggs
2014-04-01 14:14         ` [PATCH 1/3] netlink: simplify nfnetlink_bind Richard Guy Briggs
2014-04-01 14:14         ` [PATCH 2/3][v7] netlink: have netlink per-protocol bind function return an error code Richard Guy Briggs
2014-04-01 14:14         ` [PATCH 3/3] netlink: implement unbind to netlink_setsockopt NETLINK_DROP_MEMBERSHIP Richard Guy Briggs
2014-04-01 21:33         ` [PATCH 0/3] netlink: per-protocol bind fixup/enhancement set David Miller
2014-04-01 22:12           ` Richard Guy Briggs
2014-04-01 22:21             ` David Miller
2014-04-18 17:34       ` [PATCH 0/6] audit: implement multicast socket for journald Richard Guy Briggs
2014-04-18 17:34         ` [PATCH 1/6] netlink: simplify nfnetlink_bind Richard Guy Briggs
2014-04-18 17:34         ` [PATCH 2/6] netlink: have netlink per-protocol bind function return an error code Richard Guy Briggs
2014-04-22 20:19           ` David Miller
2014-04-18 17:34         ` [PATCH 3/6] netlink: implement unbind to netlink_setsockopt NETLINK_DROP_MEMBERSHIP Richard Guy Briggs
2014-04-18 17:34         ` [PATCH 4/6] audit: add netlink audit protocol bind to check capabilities on multicast join Richard Guy Briggs
2014-04-18 17:34         ` [PATCH 5/6] audit: add netlink multicast group for log read Richard Guy Briggs
2014-04-18 17:34         ` [PATCH 6/6] audit: send multicast messages only if there are listeners Richard Guy Briggs

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140326.155258.685120737486107362.davem@davemloft.net \
    --to=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=eparis@redhat.com \
    --cc=hadi@mojatatu.com \
    --cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rgb@redhat.com \
    --cc=sgrubb@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).