From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ken-ichirou MATSUZAWA Subject: Re: [ulogd PATCH 0/8] make progress ulogd_output_IPFIX Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 21:11:24 +0900 Message-ID: <20140326121122.GA24689@gmail.com> References: <20140308010344.GA4415@gmail.com> <1395600620.23474.18.camel@ice-age2.regit.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: The netfilter developer mailinglist To: Eric Leblond Return-path: Received: from mail-pb0-f48.google.com ([209.85.160.48]:32772 "EHLO mail-pb0-f48.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753518AbaCZMLl (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Mar 2014 08:11:41 -0400 Received: by mail-pb0-f48.google.com with SMTP id md12so1849868pbc.21 for ; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 05:11:40 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1395600620.23474.18.camel@ice-age2.regit.org> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hello Eric. Thank you for taking your time to see it and your reply. > Some generic points regarding this patchset: I'm resending all with following it, sorry for your inconvenience And you wrote... > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] ipfix: use nfct_bitmask > available on the system. As it is possible to build ulogd with > --disable-nfct configure flags, you need to make the build of IPFIX I see. I should have seen input/Makefile.am before, thank you. > Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] ipfix: add function for ipfix message creation > I don't like this malloc because ulogd will do an allocation for each I think we can fix allocation sizes for each of template and I worked at PATCH 8/8 but you could not see it because the patches format were invalid, sorry. Thanks.