From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] netfilter: nf_tables: enforce NLA_NUL_STRING in strings Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 14:46:00 +0200 Message-ID: <20140331124600.GA4335@localhost> References: <1396266691-3538-1-git-send-email-pablo@netfilter.org> <1396266691-3538-3-git-send-email-pablo@netfilter.org> <20140331121551.GC4682@breakpoint.cc> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, kaber@trash.net, tgraf@suug.ch To: Florian Westphal Return-path: Received: from mail.us.es ([193.147.175.20]:42230 "EHLO mail.us.es" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752154AbaCaMqI (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Mar 2014 08:46:08 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140331121551.GC4682@breakpoint.cc> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 02:15:51PM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote: > Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > > [cc'd Thomas ] > > > nla_strcmp compares the string length plus one, so it's implicitly > > including the nul-termination in the comparison. > > int nla_strcmp(const struct nlattr *nla, const char *str) > > { > > int len = strlen(str) + 1; > > ... > > d = memcmp(nla_data(nla), str, len); > > [..] > > > However, if NLA_STRING is used, userspace can send us a string without > > the null-termination. This is a problem since the nf_tables lookup > > functions won't find any matching as the last byte may mismatch. > > So we have to enforce that strings are nul-termination to avoid > > mismatches. > > Looks to me as if the real fix is: > > int nla_strcmp(const struct nlattr *nla, const char *str) > { > return nla_memcmp(nla, str, strlen(str)); > } > > [ better yet, add static inline wrapper for it ]. I think you're right, a quick look at the users of this: net/core/fib_rules.c: nla_strcmp(tb[FRA_IIFNAME], rule->iifname)) net/core/fib_rules.c: nla_strcmp(tb[FRA_OIFNAME], rule->oifname)) net/core/neighbour.c: if (nla_strcmp(tb[NDTA_NAME], tbl->id) == 0) net/decnet/dn_dev.c: if (tb[IFA_LABEL] && nla_strcmp(tb[IFA_LABEL], ifa->ifa_label)) net/ipv4/devinet.c: if (tb[IFA_LABEL] && nla_strcmp(tb[IFA_LABEL], ifa->ifa_label)) net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c: if (!nla_strcmp(nla, table->name)) net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c: !nla_strcmp(nla, chain_type[family][i]->name)) net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c: if (!nla_strcmp(nla, chain->name)) net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c: if (!nla_strcmp(nla, type->name) && net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c: if (!nla_strcmp(nla, set->name)) net/sched/act_api.c: if (nla_strcmp(kind, a->kind) == 0) { net/sched/cls_api.c: if (nla_strcmp(kind, t->kind) == 0) { net/sched/cls_api.c: } else if (tca[TCA_KIND] && nla_strcmp(tca[TCA_KIND], tp->ops->kind)) net/sched/sch_api.c: if (nla_strcmp(kind, q->id) == 0) { net/sched/sch_api.c: if (tca[TCA_KIND] && nla_strcmp(tca[TCA_KIND], q->ops->id)) net/sched/sch_api.c: if (tca[TCA_KIND] && nla_strcmp(tca[TCA_KIND], q->ops->id)) net/sched/sch_api.c: nla_strcmp(tca[TCA_KIND], q->ops->id)))) net/sched/sch_api.c: if (tca[TCA_KIND] && nla_strcmp(tca[TCA_KIND], q->ops->id In the current iproute2 tree: /ip/ipntable.c: len = strlen(namep) + 1; addattr_l(&req.n, sizeof(req), NDTA_NAME, namep, len) from ip/ipaddress.c: addattr_l(&req.n, sizeof(req), IFA_LABEL, l, strlen(l)+1) They are indeed including the nul-termination, that's why the comparison is working. I don't find any validation for TCA_KIND though, but that nla_strcmp is implicitly enforcing the nul-termination, otherwise will return a mismatch.