From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH nft] expr: do not suppress OP_EQ when RHS is bitmask type
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2014 14:09:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140404120946.GD27267@macbook.localnet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140404094433.GA4275@localhost>
On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 11:44:33AM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 10:33:28AM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote:
> > Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org> wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 11:08:38PM +0100, Florian Westphal wrote:
> > > > bitmask types default to flagcmp now, thus do not suppress OP_EQ. Else,
> > > >
> > > > rule filter output tcp flags syn
> > > > rule filter output tcp flags == syn
> > > >
> > > > are both displayed as 'flags syn'.
> > >
> > > I believe that in other selectors:
> > >
> > > selector == value
> > > selector value
> > >
> > > are equivalent.
> >
> > Yes, thats true.
> >
> > > I think it's not just that we have to fix the printing, but make it
> > > consistent.
> >
> > Not sure, this was changed recently, see
> > 6bad82aba5d304c7a2dd1b19fe57464dca327f4a
> > (evaluate: use flagcmp for single RHS bitmask expression).
>
> That change is fine, I think we only have to fix tcp flags == syn to
> make it equivalent to tcp flags syn. I don't find a good reason why
> the should behave in a different way.
Because the implicit op for bitmasks is to test for any of the given bits.
tcp flags syn really should match on syn and syn/ack.
If an equality relation is explicitly specified by the user, it also needs
to be printed. Florian's change is all we need from what I can tell.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-04 12:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-17 22:08 [PATCH nft] expr: do not suppress OP_EQ when RHS is bitmask type Florian Westphal
2014-04-04 8:17 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2014-04-04 8:33 ` Florian Westphal
2014-04-04 9:44 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2014-04-04 12:09 ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2014-04-04 14:04 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2014-04-04 14:24 ` Patrick McHardy
2014-04-04 15:23 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2014-04-04 15:39 ` Florian Westphal
2014-04-04 12:07 ` Patrick McHardy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140404120946.GD27267@macbook.localnet \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).