From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: [PATCH nft] expr: do not suppress OP_EQ when RHS is bitmask type Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2014 14:09:48 +0200 Message-ID: <20140404120946.GD27267@macbook.localnet> References: <1395094118-32580-1-git-send-email-fw@strlen.de> <20140404081723.GA3574@localhost> <20140404083328.GE6769@breakpoint.cc> <20140404094433.GA4275@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Florian Westphal , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org To: Pablo Neira Ayuso Return-path: Received: from stinky.trash.net ([213.144.137.162]:64054 "EHLO stinky.trash.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752700AbaDDMJv (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Apr 2014 08:09:51 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140404094433.GA4275@localhost> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 11:44:33AM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 10:33:28AM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote: > > Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 11:08:38PM +0100, Florian Westphal wrote: > > > > bitmask types default to flagcmp now, thus do not suppress OP_EQ. Else, > > > > > > > > rule filter output tcp flags syn > > > > rule filter output tcp flags == syn > > > > > > > > are both displayed as 'flags syn'. > > > > > > I believe that in other selectors: > > > > > > selector == value > > > selector value > > > > > > are equivalent. > > > > Yes, thats true. > > > > > I think it's not just that we have to fix the printing, but make it > > > consistent. > > > > Not sure, this was changed recently, see > > 6bad82aba5d304c7a2dd1b19fe57464dca327f4a > > (evaluate: use flagcmp for single RHS bitmask expression). > > That change is fine, I think we only have to fix tcp flags == syn to > make it equivalent to tcp flags syn. I don't find a good reason why > the should behave in a different way. Because the implicit op for bitmasks is to test for any of the given bits. tcp flags syn really should match on syn and syn/ack. If an equality relation is explicitly specified by the user, it also needs to be printed. Florian's change is all we need from what I can tell.