From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Tomasz Bursztyka <tomasz.bursztyka@linux.intel.com>
Cc: kaber@trash.net, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/3] netfilter: nf_tables: Add meta expression key for bridge interface name
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 10:34:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140408083418.GA5272@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5343B153.30804@linux.intel.com>
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 11:20:35AM +0300, Tomasz Bursztyka wrote:
> Hi Pablo,
>
> >Please, also rework this so we have one _init function for the get and
> >the set variants, ie. nft_meta_bridge_get_init and
> >nft_meta_bridge_set_init, I'd suggest.
> >
> >Apart from that, this patch looks fine to me. Thanks.
>
> I fully changed that on the version 2. This RFC is no longer valid, prior to
> Patrick's comments and also his changes on nft_meta.c
Right, I looked at the wrong patchset, sorry.
In http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/336891/, I can still see there
this chunk though.
+static void nft_meta_bridge_get_eval(const struct nft_expr *expr,
+ struct nft_data data[NFT_REG_MAX
+ 1],
+ const struct nft_pktinfo *pkt)
+{
+ const struct nft_meta *priv = nft_expr_priv(expr);
+ const struct net_device *in = pkt->in, *out = pkt->out;
+ struct nft_data *dest = &data[priv->dreg];
+ const struct net_bridge_port *p;
+
+ if (pkt->ops->pf != NFPROTO_BRIDGE)
Do you really need this or is it just defensive?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-08 8:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-27 9:19 [RFC 0/3] Add support for meta keys, bridge family specific Tomasz Bursztyka
2014-03-27 9:19 ` [RFC 1/3] netfilter: nf_tables: Make public core function of META expression Tomasz Bursztyka
2014-03-27 9:19 ` [RFC 2/3] netfilter: nf_tables: Add meta expression key for bridge interface name Tomasz Bursztyka
2014-04-08 8:06 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2014-04-08 8:20 ` Tomasz Bursztyka
2014-04-08 8:34 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2014-04-08 9:04 ` Tomasz Bursztyka
2014-03-27 9:19 ` [RFC 3/3] netfilter: nftables: Return preferably given family expression if any Tomasz Bursztyka
2014-03-27 9:26 ` Patrick McHardy
2014-03-27 11:00 ` Tomasz Bursztyka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140408083418.GA5272@localhost \
--to=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tomasz.bursztyka@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).