From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] netfilter: nf_tables: set selection Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 07:56:07 +0200 Message-ID: <20140414055605.GA541@macbook.localnet> References: <1396001988-32338-1-git-send-email-kaber@trash.net> <20140331115333.GA3623@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org To: Pablo Neira Ayuso Return-path: Received: from stinky.trash.net ([213.144.137.162]:57430 "EHLO stinky.trash.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751312AbaDNF4L (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Apr 2014 01:56:11 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140331115333.GA3623@localhost> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 01:53:33PM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 10:19:46AM +0000, Patrick McHardy wrote: > > These patches implement the basic set selection mechanism based on data > > characteristics provided by userspace. So far we only need to know the > > maximum number of elements. > > > > Instead of trying to anticipate the information future set types will > > need, the plan is to add more as we require it under the assumption > > that we will converge to a state where a new set type already has > > all information required available. The expectation is that most set > > types will require the same information for estimation since they > > most likely will be some type of tree or trie. > > I'm going to include this in the next batch for net-next before merge > window closes, which should happen soon. Thanks a lot Patrick. I can't find neither this series, nor the patch "netfilter: nf_tables: handle more than 8 * PAGE_SIZE set name allocations" anywhere in your trees or upstream. Am I missing something?