netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Bart De Schuymer <bdschuym@pandora.be>
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>,
	Vasily Averin <vvs@parallels.com>,
	netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org,
	Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
	Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] Bridge: do not defragment packets unless connection tracking is enabled
Date: Mon, 5 May 2014 01:01:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140504230116.GA3852@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53669DC3.1050903@pandora.be>

On Sun, May 04, 2014 at 10:06:27PM +0200, Bart De Schuymer wrote:
> If I understood Vasily correctly, in his setup ip_defrag is being
> called from code that isn't connection tracking. Glancing at the
> code, at least IP virtual server and the code that handles the
> router attention IP option also call ip_defrag.
> 
> Isn't there an easy way to see that the skb contains a defragmented
> IP packet? If there were, then it seems replacing the "skb->nfct !=
> NULL" by "is_defragmented(skb)" would suffice, no?

We didn't find any way that a packet larger than the mtu can hit that
code. The (re-)fragmentation only applies to a skb that fulfills
skb_has_frag_list(), so no need to restrict it.

> I see no reason to artificially restrict defrag/refrag to connection
> tracking.

After Vasily's patch, fragmentation/defragmentation on a bridge will
basically depend on if nf_defrag_ipv4 is loaded or not.

  reply	other threads:[~2014-05-04 23:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20140430092905.GA4318@localhost>
2014-05-02 15:40 ` [PATCH RFC] Bridge: do not defragment packets unless connection tracking is enabled Vasily Averin
2014-05-02 22:55   ` Florian Westphal
2014-05-03  7:15     ` Vasily Averin
2014-05-03  7:18     ` [PATCH RFC v2] " Vasily Averin
2014-05-03 23:39     ` [PATCH RFC] " Pablo Neira Ayuso
2014-05-04  0:23       ` Florian Westphal
2014-05-04 11:15         ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2014-05-04 20:06       ` Bart De Schuymer
2014-05-04 23:01         ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2014-05-05 12:55       ` [PATCH RFC 0/7] users counter to manage ipv4 defragmentation on bridge Vasily Averin
2014-05-05 20:57         ` Florian Westphal
2014-05-07 13:27           ` Vasily Averin
2014-05-07 18:49             ` Bart De Schuymer
     [not found]       ` <cover.1399292146.git.vvs@openvz.org>
2014-05-05 12:55         ` [PATCH 1/7] nf: added per net namespace ipv4 defragmentation users counter Vasily Averin
2014-05-05 12:55         ` [PATCH 2/7] nf: initialization of " Vasily Averin
2014-05-05 12:56         ` [PATCH 3/7] nf: increment and decrement functions for " Vasily Averin
2014-05-05 12:56         ` [PATCH 4/7] nf: ipv4 defragmentation users counter changes in nf_conntrack_ipv4 module Vasily Averin
2014-05-05 12:56         ` [PATCH 5/7] nf: ipv4 defragmentation users counter changes in TPROXY target Vasily Averin
2014-05-05 12:56         ` [PATCH 6/7] nf: ipv4 defragmentation users counter changes in xt_socket match Vasily Averin
2014-05-05 12:56         ` [PATCH 7/7] nf: use counter to manage ipv4 defragmentation on bridge Vasily Averin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140504230116.GA3852@localhost \
    --to=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=bdschuym@pandora.be \
    --cc=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=kaber@trash.net \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=vvs@parallels.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).