From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v3 0/2] per-netns sysctl for br_netfilter Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 14:28:59 +0200 Message-ID: <20140529122859.GA5412@localhost> References: <20140512140706.GA22082@macbook.localnet> <5370F772.3050004@parallels.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Bart De Schuymer , Patrick McHardy , Florian Westphal , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org To: Vasily Averin Return-path: Received: from mail.us.es ([193.147.175.20]:42201 "EHLO mail.us.es" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755546AbaE2M3P (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 May 2014 08:29:15 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5370F772.3050004@parallels.com> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Vasily, On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 08:31:46PM +0400, Vasily Averin wrote: > Dear Patrick, > thank you for feedback. > Frankly speaking I still badly understand how it's better to split this patch set. > Finally I've decided to combine v2 patches to 2 parts (1-8 and 9-11). > Could you please explain how to it better? > > This patch set enables per network namespace managemnt for br_netfiltes sysctls, > it allows to enable processing br-nf-call hooks in ones network namespaces > and keep it disabled in another ones. > > v3: patches are merged into more large chunks > v2: removed extra overhead for CONFIG_SYSCTL=n Any further concern with this v3 patchset? Thanks.