From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso Subject: Re: [PATCH] iptables: add optional [seconds] argument to -w Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2014 12:05:21 +0200 Message-ID: <20140602100521.GA15386@localhost> References: <1400778571-1482-1-git-send-email-jpopelka@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org To: Jiri Popelka Return-path: Received: from mail.us.es ([193.147.175.20]:45260 "EHLO mail.us.es" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752976AbaFBKF3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Jun 2014 06:05:29 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1400778571-1482-1-git-send-email-jpopelka@redhat.com> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 07:09:31PM +0200, Jiri Popelka wrote: > This patch adds an optional numeric argument > to -w option which can be used to specify > how long to wait for an exclusive lock. > > If the value isn't specified it works as before, > i.e. program waits indefinitely. > > If user specifies it, program exits after > the given time interval passes. No major objections to this, only one change: Please, adapt the nftables compat code so the parser doesn't complain if someone passes -w value. Thanks.