netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] netfilter: conntrack: remove timer from ecache extension
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 16:57:17 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140610145717.GA12398@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140605145640.GC23367@breakpoint.cc>

Hi Florian,

I already told you, your patchset works in my testbed here.

My only doubt still here is the need for the extra bit. I don't find
the scenario that will trigger the problem yet. Some comments:

On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 04:56:40PM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote:
> Yes, its recycling.
> IPS_DYING_BIT unset would either mean:
> 
> a) 'This conntrack is dead and redelivery failed.  Resend event, then
> destroy this conntrack'.

OK. In this case the conntrack in located in the dying list.

> OR it can mean
> 
> b) 'This conntrack is being allocated/setup as new connection, the
> flag field was already cleared'.

In this case, the conntrack is placed in the unconfirmed list or the
hashes.

> In the 2nd case, the conntrack_put would be fatal since the work queue
> doesn't own the conntrack (plus the tuple is not dying after all...).

The workqueue operates with conntracks that are placed in the dying
list. If another CPU holds a reference, the use counter is 2, one for
the dying list and another for the reference. The conntrack_put will
either a) release the entry whose event was already delivered or b)
decrement the use counter.

> I've found no way to tell these two conditions apart except via new bit.

I believe the rule: "all dead conntracks have the dying bit set"
always fulfills.

I must be overlooking something... let me know, thanks!

  reply	other threads:[~2014-06-10 14:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-05-22  9:43 [PATCH -next] remove timer from ecache extension Florian Westphal
2014-05-22  9:43 ` [PATCH 1/2] netfilter: ctnetlink: only export whitelisted flags to userspace Florian Westphal
2014-05-22  9:43 ` [PATCH 2/2] netfilter: conntrack: remove timer from ecache extension Florian Westphal
2014-06-05 14:25   ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2014-06-05 14:33     ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2014-06-05 21:05       ` Florian Westphal
2014-06-05 14:56     ` Florian Westphal
2014-06-10 14:57       ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2014-06-10 15:36         ` Florian Westphal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140610145717.GA12398@localhost \
    --to=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).