From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Arturo Borrero Gonzalez <arturo.borrero.glez@gmail.com>
Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>,
Netfilter Development Mailing list
<netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: nft option to flush out the existing ruleset [was Re: [libnftnl PATCH] examples: add nft-ruleset-replace]
Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2014 16:17:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140901151731.GA19729@acer.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOkSjBhJQGyJOJ=VwZmr-vhtPF5LRiCqD54XfOteHDo68X4dWw@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 05:07:23PM +0200, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote:
> On 26 August 2014 13:09, Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org> wrote:
> > Please, implement this in nft. I think we can probably have an -x
> > option, eg.
> >
> > nft -f -x ruleset-file
> >
> > The '-x' indicates that you want to flush any previous existing
> > configuration before loading this 'ruleset-file'.
> >
> > -xx could also be used to remove any configuration regarding the
> > existing families in the ruleset-file, ie. if the ruleset-file only
> > contains a configuration for 'ip', all remaining families are left
> > untouched.
> >
>
> Hi Pablo, Patrick.
>
> I've looked into how to implement this '-x' option.
>
> I wonder if it worth having better a "formal" command, like
> % nft flush ruleset
> % nft flush ruleset ip
> % nft flush ruleset ip6
> % nft flush ruleset arp
> [...]
>
> This way, a user loading a new ruleset with -f can just put a first
> line like this:
>
> =========
> nft flush ruleset
> nft add table ip filter
> nft add chain ip filter input
> nft add rule ip filter input counter
> nft add table ip6 filter
> nft add chain ip6 filter input
> [...]
> =========
>
> Or flush per family, as Pablo suggested:
>
> =========
> nft flush ruleset inet
> nft add table inet filter
> [...]
> =========
>
> Some benefits of this approach is that we have a concrete order to
> flush the ruleset, in the case the user wants no ruleset.
> The lack of this shortcut seem an actual concern of some users.
I agree, this sounds better than a command line option.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-01 15:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-26 9:57 [libnftnl PATCH] examples: add nft-ruleset-replace Arturo Borrero Gonzalez
2014-08-26 11:09 ` nft option to flush out the existing ruleset [was Re: [libnftnl PATCH] examples: add nft-ruleset-replace] Pablo Neira Ayuso
2014-08-26 12:14 ` Patrick McHardy
2014-08-26 13:12 ` Arturo Borrero Gonzalez
2014-08-26 13:30 ` Patrick McHardy
2014-08-26 13:47 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2014-08-26 14:35 ` Patrick McHardy
2014-08-26 13:38 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2014-09-01 15:07 ` Arturo Borrero Gonzalez
2014-09-01 15:17 ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140901151731.GA19729@acer.localdomain \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=arturo.borrero.glez@gmail.com \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).