From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Florian Westphal Subject: Re: bridge: Respect call-iptables sysctls everywhere Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2014 11:13:43 +0200 Message-ID: <20141005091343.GA11246@breakpoint.cc> References: <1412384670-17794-1-git-send-email-fw@strlen.de> <20141004035606.GA8228@gondor.apana.org.au> <20141004100413.GA1241@breakpoint.cc> <20141004135508.GA10705@gondor.apana.org.au> <20141004141802.GA10878@gondor.apana.org.au> <20141004180647.GB1241@breakpoint.cc> <20141005035343.GA13696@gondor.apana.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Florian Westphal , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, bsd@redhat.com, stephen@networkplumber.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, davidn@davidnewall.com, "David S. Miller" To: Herbert Xu Return-path: Received: from Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc ([80.244.247.6]:44334 "EHLO Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750950AbaJEJNx (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Oct 2014 05:13:53 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20141005035343.GA13696@gondor.apana.org.au> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Herbert Xu wrote: > On Sat, Oct 04, 2014 at 08:06:47PM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote: > > > > Fair enough. We lose frag_max_size information from ipv4 defrag, > > While reviewing this code it occured to me that we have a serious > bug in that call-iptables sysctls aren't even respected in FORWARD > and POST_ROUTING. Here is a patch that fixes this. Upcalls to iptables in FORWARD/POSTROUTING depend on skb->nf_bridge being set up, which only happens when call-iptables=1.