From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.cz>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Corey Minyard <minyard@acm.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>,
Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru>,
James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>,
openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next 2/2] seq_putc: Convert to return void and convert uses too.
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 13:29:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141112122900.GA1542@salvia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141111134740.GB2567@pathway.suse.cz>
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 02:47:40PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Mon 2014-11-10 10:58:57, Joe Perches wrote:
> > Using the return value of seq_putc is error-prone, so
> > make it return void instead.
> >
> > Reverse the logic in seq_putc to make it like seq_puts.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.cz>
>
> The changes are correct. The show() functions should return 0
> even when there is an overflow. They are called by traverse()
> from seq_read() that might increase the buffer size and try again.
Just in case you need this for the netfilter chunks:
Acked-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-12 12:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-10 18:58 [PATCH -next 0/2] seq: Convert seq_puts and seq_putc to return void Joe Perches
2014-11-10 18:58 ` [PATCH -next 2/2] seq_putc: Convert to return void and convert uses too Joe Perches
2014-11-11 13:47 ` Petr Mladek
2014-11-12 12:29 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2014-11-12 15:25 ` Corey Minyard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141112122900.GA1542@salvia \
--to=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=coreteam@netfilter.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu \
--cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=minyard@acm.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=pmladek@suse.cz \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).