From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Rahul Sharma <rsharma@arista.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <hideaki.yoshifuji@miraclelinux.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] ipv6: Prevent ipv6_find_hdr() from returning ENOENT for valid non-first fragments
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2015 12:31:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150109113145.GA4426@salvia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54AFA502.8090701@miraclelinux.com>
On Fri, Jan 09, 2015 at 06:53:06PM +0900, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Rahul Sharma wrote:
> >ipv6_find_hdr() currently assumes that the next-header field in the
> >fragment header of the non-first fragment is the "protocol number of
> >the last header" (here last header excludes any extension header
> >protocol numbers ) which is incorrect as per RFC2460. The next-header
> >value is the first header of the fragmentable part of the original
> >packet (which can be extension header as well).
> >This can create reassembly problems. For example: Fragmented
> >authenticated OSPFv3 packets (where AH header is inserted before the
> >protocol header). For the second fragment, the next header value in
> >the fragment header will be NEXTHDR_AUTH which is correct but
> >ipv6_find_hdr will return ENOENT since AH is an extension header
> >resulting in second fragment getting dropped. This check for the
> >presence of non-extension header needs to be removed.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Rahul Sharma <rsharma@arista.com>
>
> Acked-by: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
I already mentioned this patch will break ip6tables.
And it doesn't make sense to me that you still hit the problem with
nf_defrag_ipv6.
Could you please hold on with this patch until we clarify what the
real undelying problem is? Could you send me a pcap trace?
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-09 11:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-09 8:26 [PATCH net v2] ipv6: Prevent ipv6_find_hdr() from returning ENOENT for valid non-first fragments Rahul Sharma
2015-01-09 9:53 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki
2015-01-09 11:31 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150109113145.GA4426@salvia \
--to=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=hannes@stressinduktion.org \
--cc=hideaki.yoshifuji@miraclelinux.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rsharma@arista.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).