From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: 'Thomas Graf' Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] rhashtable: Lower/upper bucket may map to same lock while shrinking Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 15:56:05 +0000 Message-ID: <20150113155605.GN20387@casper.infradead.org> References: <20150112232217.GA5277@wfg-t540p.sh.intel.com> <20150112235821.GB16617@casper.infradead.org> <063D6719AE5E284EB5DD2968C1650D6D1CAC6593@AcuExch.aculab.com> <20150113112507.GH20387@casper.infradead.org> <063D6719AE5E284EB5DD2968C1650D6D1CAC6969@AcuExch.aculab.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "davem@davemloft.net" , Fengguang Wu , LKP , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org" , "coreteam@netfilter.org" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" To: David Laight Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <063D6719AE5E284EB5DD2968C1650D6D1CAC6969@AcuExch.aculab.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org On 01/13/15 at 03:06pm, David Laight wrote: > OK, ht->mutes saves the day. > Might be worth a comment to save people looking at the code in isolation > from worrying and doing a bit search. > OTOH it might be obvious from a slightly larger fragment than the diff. Good idea. Will do this. Also, thanks for the suggestion in the other email. I now understand what you meant.