netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: Bernhard Thaler <bernhard.thaler@wvnet.at>
Cc: pablo@netfilter.org, kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu,
	netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 1/1] bridge: forward IPv6 fragmented packets when passing netfilter
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 10:39:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150127093951.GE1373@breakpoint.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1422321724-325-1-git-send-email-bernhard.thaler@wvnet.at>

Bernhard Thaler <bernhard.thaler@wvnet.at> wrote:
>         modprobe br_netfilter
>         brctl addbr br0
>         brctl addif br0 eth0
>         brctl addif br0 eth2
>         ifconfig eth0 up
>         ifconfig eth2 up
>         ifconfig br0 up
> 
> 2) place a host with an IPv6 address on each side of the bridge
> 
>         set IPv6 address on host A:
>         ip -6 addr add fd01:2345:6789:1::1/64 dev eth0
> 
>         set IPv6 address on host B:
>         ip -6 addr add fd01:2345:6789:1::2/64 dev eth0
> 
> 3) run a simple ping command on host A with packets > MTU
> 
>         ping6 -s 4000 fd01:2345:6789:1::2
> 
> 4) wait some time and run e.g. "ip6tables -t nat -nvL" on the bridge
> 
> IPv6 fragmented packets traverse the bridge cleanly until "ip6tables -t nat -nvL"
> is run. As soon as it is run (and netfilter modules are loaded) IPv6 fragmented
> packets do not traverse the bridge any more (you see no more responses in ping's
> output).
> 
> Patch exports ip6_fragment() in include/net/ipv6.h and net/ipv6/ip6_output.c
> to use it in net/bridge/br_netfilter.c's br_nf_dev_queue_xmit() for IPv6 packets
> that need to be fragmented.

I think this looks good, however afaics there is now a direct dependeny on
ipv6.ko module.  I think it would be nice if we could avoid this.

There are 2 ways to do this,
a) add fragment to nf_ipv6_ops
or
b) add fragment to pingv6_ops in include/net/ping.h

Ideally, those two should be merged into a single one, say e.g. ipv6_ops,
exported by core and wired up when ipv6 module is present, but I don't
want to push this on you, so e.g. adding fragment to nf_ipv6_ops is
fine with me.

With indirect call we could avoid ip6_fragment dependency.


  reply	other threads:[~2015-01-27  9:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-19  0:43 [PATCH 1/1] bridge: forward IPv6 fragmented packets when passing netfilter Bernhard Thaler
2015-01-20 17:28 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2015-01-22 23:27   ` [PATCHv2 " Bernhard Thaler
2015-01-22 23:49     ` Florian Westphal
2015-01-27  1:22       ` [PATCHv3 " Bernhard Thaler
2015-01-27  9:39         ` Florian Westphal [this message]
2015-01-27 23:15           ` [PATCHv4 RFC " Bernhard Thaler
2015-01-30 17:17             ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2015-01-30 17:25               ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2015-03-18 21:53                 ` [PATCH 2/4] " Bernhard Thaler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150127093951.GE1373@breakpoint.cc \
    --to=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=bernhard.thaler@wvnet.at \
    --cc=kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).