From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] rhashtable: Introduce rhashtable_walk_*
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 09:45:41 +0000
Message-ID: <20150127094541.GC22262@casper.infradead.org>
References: <E1YFWUl-0004gE-SH@gondolin.me.apana.org.au>
 <063D6719AE5E284EB5DD2968C1650D6D1CAD2C12@AcuExch.aculab.com>
 <20150126222259.GC30116@gondor.apana.org.au>
 <20150126.143613.1798698028405169123.davem@davemloft.net>
 <20150126224216.GA30551@gondor.apana.org.au>
 <20150126233100.GA31108@gondor.apana.org.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, David.Laight@ACULAB.COM,
	ying.xue@windriver.com, kaber@trash.net,
	paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20150126233100.GA31108@gondor.apana.org.au>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org

On 01/27/15 at 10:31am, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 09:42:16AM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
> > 
> > As otherwise we'd be looking at fixing the existing users (in
> > particular, nft_hash) properly which might take a lot more time.
> 
> I take that back.  Looks like my walkers would be no good for
> netfilter anyway since it wants to do nested walks, meaning no
> locks can be taken.
> 
> So I think I'll just have to tackle netfilter first in which case
> the walk function would be no use anyway since I could just fix
> netlink by itself.

OK. I'll wait for your netfilter approach before posting NLM_F_INTR
patches.