netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Vine <chris@cvine.freeserve.co.uk>
To: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: xt_recent fails with kernel 3.19.0
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 10:51:45 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150212105145.5e0177c0@bother.homenet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150212102553.0bd25767@bother.homenet>

On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 10:25:53 +0000
Chris Vine <chris@cvine.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
> Loading 'recent' xtables match support for iptables fails where the
> following sample rule is appended with SSH_TRIES set to 4:
> 
>   iptables -A SSH_CHAIN -m conntrack --ctstate NEW \
>     -m recent --update --seconds $SSH_LOGIN_PERIOD --hitcount
> $SSH_TRIES -j DROP
> 
> It fails with this message:
> 
>   kernel: xt_recent: hitcount (4) is larger than packets to be
>   remembered (4) for table DEFAULT
> 
> This appears to be due to an off-by-one error in testing the hit
> count in recent_mt_check().  This occurs because nstamp_mask is set
> to one less than the value of ip_pkt_list_tot (if any) or of
> hit_count rounded up to a power of two value.  When that hit count
> boundary is actually reached nstamp_mask is therefore exceeded by one.
> 
> I can't say I fully understand the heuristics of nstamp_mask, but the
> patch below deals with this and works for me(TM).
> 
> Signed-of-by: Chris Vine <vine.chris@gmail.com>
> 
> --- linux-3.19.0/net/netfilter/xt_recent.c~	2015-02-10
> 09:18:44.657376355 +0000 +++
> linux-3.19.0/net/netfilter/xt_recent.c	2015-02-11
> 17:58:33.311608835 +0000 @@ -378,7 +378,7 @@
> mutex_lock(&recent_mutex); t = recent_table_lookup(recent_net,
> info->name); if (t != NULL) {
> -		if (info->hit_count > t->nstamps_max_mask) {
> +		if (info->hit_count > t->nstamps_max_mask + 1) {
>  			pr_info("hitcount (%u) is larger than
> packets to be remembered (%u) for table %s\n", info->hit_count,
> t->nstamps_max_mask + 1, info->name);

Scrub that.  This now fails when SSH_TRIES is set to other than a power
of two boundary.  There seems to be something fundamentally wrong with
the heuristic employed here.

Chris
the

  reply	other threads:[~2015-02-12 10:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-02-12 10:25 xt_recent fails with kernel 3.19.0 Chris Vine
2015-02-12 10:51 ` Chris Vine [this message]
2015-02-12 11:09   ` Chris Vine
2015-02-12 11:36     ` Florian Westphal
2015-02-12 11:52       ` Florian Westphal
2015-02-12 17:04         ` Chris Vine
2015-02-12 17:09           ` Florian Westphal
2015-02-12 21:34             ` Chris Vine
2015-02-12 21:40               ` Florian Westphal
2015-02-12 21:57                 ` Chris Vine

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150212105145.5e0177c0@bother.homenet \
    --to=chris@cvine.freeserve.co.uk \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).