From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: Chris Vine <chris@cvine.freeserve.co.uk>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: xt_recent fails with kernel 3.19.0
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 12:36:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150212113643.GA13795@breakpoint.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150212110931.6db17d7c@bother.homenet>
Chris Vine <chris@cvine.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
> > > info->name); if (t != NULL) {
> > > - if (info->hit_count > t->nstamps_max_mask) {
> > > + if (info->hit_count > t->nstamps_max_mask + 1) {
> > > pr_info("hitcount (%u) is larger than
> > > packets to be remembered (%u) for table %s\n", info->hit_count,
> > > t->nstamps_max_mask + 1, info->name);
> >
> > Scrub that. This now fails when SSH_TRIES is set to other than a
> > power of two boundary. There seems to be something fundamentally
> > wrong with the heuristic employed here.
>
> On more testing I am wrong about that. You seem to need to rmmod
> xt_recent to get it to flush the previous setting. With that done, the
> patch does indeed seem to work with any values of SSH_TRIES.
Grrr. Right. This is because if you have single
-m recent --name DEFAULT ..
iptables-save > foo
then edit foo to bump the hitcount, then run
iptables-restore < foo
we'll find the existing DEFAULT entry with the old hitcount.
It works for something like 11 -> 13 since we're internally
tracking a count of 16 (mask 15).
I don't see a simple fix except your patch above plus
-static unsigned int ip_pkt_list_tot __read_mostly;
+static unsigned int ip_pkt_list_tot __read_mostly = 32;
To work around this.
This causes us to ignore hitcount in the check completely, at additional
memory cost.
I'll see if we can fix this in a better way.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-12 11:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-12 10:25 xt_recent fails with kernel 3.19.0 Chris Vine
2015-02-12 10:51 ` Chris Vine
2015-02-12 11:09 ` Chris Vine
2015-02-12 11:36 ` Florian Westphal [this message]
2015-02-12 11:52 ` Florian Westphal
2015-02-12 17:04 ` Chris Vine
2015-02-12 17:09 ` Florian Westphal
2015-02-12 21:34 ` Chris Vine
2015-02-12 21:40 ` Florian Westphal
2015-02-12 21:57 ` Chris Vine
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150212113643.GA13795@breakpoint.cc \
--to=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=chris@cvine.freeserve.co.uk \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).