From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: Chris Vine <chris@cvine.freeserve.co.uk>
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: xt_recent fails with kernel 3.19.0
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 22:40:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150212214030.GH22887@breakpoint.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150212213410.5a91da77@bother.homenet>
Chris Vine <chris@cvine.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 18:09:31 +0100
> Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de> wrote:
> [snip]
> > > This patch seems to be doing
> > > something different, and I note that nstamps_max_mask is
> > > unconditionally set later in recent_mt_check() anyway.
> >
> > No, its only set if recent_table_lookup returns NULL.
> > We return soon after we bump the refcnt when we take this branch.
>
> You probably are working on a more up-to-date branch. Your patch
> assigning to nstamps_max_mask is only executed if recent_table_lookup()
> does not return NULL. In the 3.19.0 kernel, the assignment to
> nstamps_max_mask in line 404 also only occurs if recent_table_lookup()
> does not return NULL.
Thats what I meant -- line 404 is ONLY executed if the table doesn't
exist, so we need to assign it in case we have a table and we want
to increase the upper limit of the _existing_ table.
Unless someone spots an issue with this approach i'll submit this
formally tomorrow.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-12 21:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-12 10:25 xt_recent fails with kernel 3.19.0 Chris Vine
2015-02-12 10:51 ` Chris Vine
2015-02-12 11:09 ` Chris Vine
2015-02-12 11:36 ` Florian Westphal
2015-02-12 11:52 ` Florian Westphal
2015-02-12 17:04 ` Chris Vine
2015-02-12 17:09 ` Florian Westphal
2015-02-12 21:34 ` Chris Vine
2015-02-12 21:40 ` Florian Westphal [this message]
2015-02-12 21:57 ` Chris Vine
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150212214030.GH22887@breakpoint.cc \
--to=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=chris@cvine.freeserve.co.uk \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).