From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] netfilter: nf_tables: set transactions Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 12:15:30 +0100 Message-ID: <20150326111530.GA3769@salvia> References: <1427292530-28529-1-git-send-email-kaber@trash.net> <20150326110949.GB3734@salvia> <20150326110700.GH3526@acer.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org To: Patrick McHardy Return-path: Received: from mail.us.es ([193.147.175.20]:49488 "EHLO mail.us.es" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751278AbbCZLLf (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Mar 2015 07:11:35 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150326110700.GH3526@acer.localdomain> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 11:07:01AM +0000, Patrick McHardy wrote: > On 26.03, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 02:08:46PM +0000, Patrick McHardy wrote: > > > These patches add transaction support to set elements. It pretty much > > > resembles the existing transaction support, the changelogs explain it > > > in more detail. > > > > Thanks a lot for finishing this support. > > > > > As a by-product the patches get rid of the RCU grace period for every > > > nft_hash element that is destroyed, we now have only the single global > > > transaction grace perdiod independantly of what we destroy. > > > > Great work. > > > > Applied, thanks Patrick! > > Thanks! Next batch will follow shortly :) I'm going to send a pull request to try to keep the batch relatively small, so the next batch will just sit for a while on the list, OK? Thanks!