From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: pablo@netfilter.org
Cc: hannes@stressinduktion.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, jiri@resnulli.us
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] netfilter: Pass socket pointer down through okfn().
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2015 12:01:22 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150407.120122.1683603489877737371.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150407153533.GA3979@salvia>
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2015 17:35:33 +0200
> On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 04:44:29PM +0200, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
>> On So, 2015-04-05 at 22:19 -0400, David Miller wrote:
>> > --- a/include/linux/netfilter.h
>> > +++ b/include/linux/netfilter.h
>> > @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ struct nf_hook_state {
>> > struct net_device *in;
>> > struct net_device *out;
>> > struct sock *sk;
>> > - int (*okfn)(struct sk_buff *);
>> > + int (*okfn)(struct sock *, struct sk_buff *);
>> > };
>>
>> If we give okfn the signature int (*okfn)(struct nf_hook_state *); then
>> we would not need to touch anything else to enhance this.
>>
>> What do you think?
>
> I guess you mean something like:
>
> int (*okfn)(struct sk_buff *, struct nf_hook_state *);
>
> I agree that would save us from more changes on the okfn() signature.
> I think it's OK if that change is introduced once we have some client
> code that needs it, I mean in a follow up patch.
No, becuase this means things like ip_finish_output(), and even
generic functions like dst_output(), dev_loopback_xmit(), and friends
will have netfilter specific arguments, and that is not acceptable.
Please do not suggest this.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-07 16:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-06 2:19 [PATCH 3/4] netfilter: Pass socket pointer down through okfn() David Miller
2015-04-07 14:44 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2015-04-07 15:35 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2015-04-07 16:01 ` David Miller [this message]
2015-04-07 18:56 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2015-04-07 19:18 ` David Miller
2015-04-07 15:59 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150407.120122.1683603489877737371.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hannes@stressinduktion.org \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).