From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso Subject: Re: [conntrack-tools PATCH] nfct: don't link against libnetfilter_conntrack Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 20:46:50 +0200 Message-ID: <20150826184650.GA15075@salvia> References: <20150820113841.3543.68437.stgit@nfdev2.cica.es> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Jan Engelhardt , Netfilter Developer Mailing List To: Arturo Borrero Gonzalez Return-path: Received: from mail.us.es ([193.147.175.20]:49729 "EHLO mail.us.es" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751690AbbHZSk3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Aug 2015 14:40:29 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 08:54:00AM +0200, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote: > On 20 August 2015 at 20:30, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > > On Thursday 2015-08-20 13:38, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote: > > > >>The nfct program uses none of the symbols of libnetfilter_conntrack. > >> > >>Linking against it means that distributors have to maintain an useless > >>depedency. > > > > Not to say the patch is bad, but: > > Distributions do not really have to maintain a dependency anyway, > > as it can be autodiscovered from the DT_NEEDED entries. In addition, > > conntrackd still uses the library, so a dependency in the package > > will stay around. > > In case of debian, there are 3 different binary packages for > conntrack, conntrackd and nfct. Each package may have different > dependencies. Also applied, thanks Arturo.