From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Florian Westphal Subject: Re: NFQUEUE parallelization Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 00:18:45 +0200 Message-ID: <20150924221845.GB24240@breakpoint.cc> References: <20150924204840.GC29479@breakpoint.cc> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Florian Westphal , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org To: Eugene Strulyov , g@breakpoint.cc Return-path: Received: from Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc ([80.244.247.6]:59722 "EHLO Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753544AbbIXWSs (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Sep 2015 18:18:48 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Eugene Strulyov wrote: Please don't top post. > Thanks for your reply. > > So with regards to parallelization, I need to use multiple queues, correct? Not necessarily, but it avoids contention for a (single) queue. > Also, with --queue-balance, will the same (src_ip, dst_ip) pair always > map to the same queue? Yes, all saddr,daddr [and replies] get into same queue.