* NFQUEUE parallelization
@ 2015-09-24 19:56 Eugene Strulyov
2015-09-24 20:48 ` Florian Westphal
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Eugene Strulyov @ 2015-09-24 19:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netfilter-devel
Hi,
I am implementing a custom filter using the libnetfilter_queue
library. Performance is important, so I am looking at ways to
parallelize it. The options I see are as follows:
- single queue, multiple threads
- multiple queues, multiple threads
- multiple queues, multiple processes (1 per queue)
Which of these options would be most effective?
The guide I found here
https://home.regit.org/netfilter-en/using-nfqueue-and-libnetfilter_queue/
says "the nfq_set_verdict2 and nfq_handle_packet function needs to be
protected by lock mechanism." Does that mean that there can be at most
2 threads per queue?
When using multiple queues, is it valid to call nfq_open() multiple
times in the same process? When I do that I get negative numbers for
peer portid. Is this normal?
$ sudo cat /proc/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue
100 27790 0 2 65531 0 0 0 1
101 -4585 0 2 65531 0 0 0 1
102 -4586 0 2 65531 0 0 0 1
103 -4587 0 2 65531 0 0 0 1
Also, how exactly does --queue-balance work? All packets seem to be
directed to one particular queue.
thanks,
Eugene
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: NFQUEUE parallelization
2015-09-24 19:56 NFQUEUE parallelization Eugene Strulyov
@ 2015-09-24 20:48 ` Florian Westphal
2015-09-24 21:55 ` Eugene Strulyov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Florian Westphal @ 2015-09-24 20:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eugene Strulyov; +Cc: netfilter-devel
Eugene Strulyov <eugene.strulyov@gmail.com> wrote:
> When using multiple queues, is it valid to call nfq_open() multiple
> times in the same process?
Yes.
> When I do that I get negative numbers for
> peer portid. Is this normal?
> $ sudo cat /proc/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue
> 100 27790 0 2 65531 0 0 0 1
> 101 -4585 0 2 65531 0 0 0 1
The proc formatter in nfnetlink_queue uses %d instead of %u.
It was fixed a few months back.
> Also, how exactly does --queue-balance work? All packets seem to be
> directed to one particular queue.
Hash over ipv4/ipv6 source & dst addresses.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: NFQUEUE parallelization
2015-09-24 20:48 ` Florian Westphal
@ 2015-09-24 21:55 ` Eugene Strulyov
2015-09-24 22:18 ` Florian Westphal
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Eugene Strulyov @ 2015-09-24 21:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Florian Westphal; +Cc: netfilter-devel
Thanks for your reply.
So with regards to parallelization, I need to use multiple queues, correct?
Also, with --queue-balance, will the same (src_ip, dst_ip) pair always
map to the same queue? If yes, I can make each queue handler a
separate process.
thanks,
Eugene
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de> wrote:
> Eugene Strulyov <eugene.strulyov@gmail.com> wrote:
>> When using multiple queues, is it valid to call nfq_open() multiple
>> times in the same process?
>
> Yes.
>
>> When I do that I get negative numbers for
>> peer portid. Is this normal?
>
>> $ sudo cat /proc/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue
>> 100 27790 0 2 65531 0 0 0 1
>> 101 -4585 0 2 65531 0 0 0 1
>
> The proc formatter in nfnetlink_queue uses %d instead of %u.
> It was fixed a few months back.
>
>> Also, how exactly does --queue-balance work? All packets seem to be
>> directed to one particular queue.
>
> Hash over ipv4/ipv6 source & dst addresses.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: NFQUEUE parallelization
2015-09-24 21:55 ` Eugene Strulyov
@ 2015-09-24 22:18 ` Florian Westphal
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Florian Westphal @ 2015-09-24 22:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eugene Strulyov, g; +Cc: Florian Westphal, netfilter-devel
Eugene Strulyov <eugene.strulyov@gmail.com> wrote:
Please don't top post.
> Thanks for your reply.
>
> So with regards to parallelization, I need to use multiple queues, correct?
Not necessarily, but it avoids contention for a (single) queue.
> Also, with --queue-balance, will the same (src_ip, dst_ip) pair always
> map to the same queue?
Yes, all saddr,daddr [and replies] get into same queue.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-09-24 22:18 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-09-24 19:56 NFQUEUE parallelization Eugene Strulyov
2015-09-24 20:48 ` Florian Westphal
2015-09-24 21:55 ` Eugene Strulyov
2015-09-24 22:18 ` Florian Westphal
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).