From: Guillaume Nault <g.nault@alphalink.fr>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [libmnl] Creating netlink socket with SOCK_CLOEXEC flag
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 20:50:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151001185059.GD2911@alphalink.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151001165005.GA2107@salvia>
On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 06:50:05PM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 06:16:04PM +0200, Guillaume Nault wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm looking at how libmnl could be used with CLOEXEC netlink sockets.
> > Of course, one can use the
> > nl = mnl_socket_open();
> > fd = mnl_socket_get_fd(nl);
> > fcntl(fd, F_SETFD, O_CLOEXEC);
> > sequence, but this is racy in multi-threaded programs, where another
> > thread could fork()/execve() between the mnl_socket_open() and the
> > fcntl() calls. Applying the CLOEXEC flag at socket creation closes this
> > issue.
> >
> > There are three different approaches I can think of:
> > 1- Make mnl_socket_open() unconditionally add the SOCK_CLOEXEC flag in
> > its socket() call.
> > 2- Define mnl_socket_open2(), similar to mnl_socket_open() but with an
> > additional flags parameter that would be passed to socket().
> > 3- Tell user to create its netlink socket with the required flags and
> > use it with mnl_socket_fdopen().
> >
> > Solution #1 would provide safe default for all users, but that'd be an
> > ABI change. Also decision would need to be made wrt. platforms not
> > handling SOCK_CLOEXEC.
> >
> > Solution #2 is more generic and allows all SOCK_* flags defined by the
> > plateform. But it's a bit more inelegant and exports yet another function
> > to allocate an mnl socket.
>
> I'd suggest you add mnl_socket_open2().
Ok, will do.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-01 18:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-01 16:16 [libmnl] Creating netlink socket with SOCK_CLOEXEC flag Guillaume Nault
2015-10-01 16:50 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2015-10-01 18:50 ` Guillaume Nault [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151001185059.GD2911@alphalink.fr \
--to=g.nault@alphalink.fr \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).