From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/12] nfnetlink: use y2038 safe timestamp Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 14:53:55 +0200 Message-ID: <20151002125355.GA31638@salvia> References: <1443612402-3000775-1-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> <1443612402-3000775-9-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, y2038@lists.linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" , Patrick McHardy , Jozsef Kadlecsik , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org To: Arnd Bergmann Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1443612402-3000775-9-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 01:26:38PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > The __build_packet_message function fills a nfulnl_msg_packet_timestamp > structure that uses 64-bit seconds and is therefore y2038 safe, but > it uses an intermediate 'struct timespec' which is not. > > This trivially changes the code to use 'struct timespec64' instead, > to correct the result on 32-bit architectures. > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann > Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso > Cc: Patrick McHardy > Cc: Jozsef Kadlecsik > Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org > Cc: coreteam@netfilter.org Acked-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso BTW, I don't see the patch for nfnetlink_queue and I think I have seen it in the diffstat from your cover letter.