From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso Subject: Re: [PATCH nft 0/7] listing command updates Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 20:33:12 +0200 Message-ID: <20151012183312.GA9016@salvia> References: <1444337370-8269-1-git-send-email-pablo@netfilter.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Netfilter Development Mailing list , Patrick McHardy , Florian Westphal To: Arturo Borrero Gonzalez Return-path: Received: from mail.us.es ([193.147.175.20]:45130 "EHLO mail.us.es" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751373AbbJLS0O (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Oct 2015 14:26:14 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 09:09:10AM +0200, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote: > On 8 October 2015 at 22:49, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > > Hi, > > > > This patchset is following up after: > > > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/netfilter-devel/msg38491.html > > > > In a nutshell, what I'm proposing is that: > > > > * `list {tables,chains,sets}' only display the object declaration, not its > > definition (ie. content). Moreover, if no family is specified, then they > > show all families to get this aligned with `list ruleset'. > > > > * If you want to obtain the objects definition, then you use the > > `list {table,chain,set}' variant. > > > > * We always provide an output that doesn't break `nft -f'. > > > > Let me know if you have any comment, > > I agree with the changes :-) > > Acked-by: Arturo Borrero Gonzalez Just pushed out this. Please, help testing, thanks.