From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso Subject: Re: Need net-next in nf-next for netfilter ipv6 frag patchset Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2015 13:05:16 +0200 Message-ID: <20151017110516.GA1841@salvia> References: <20151017090047.GB30789@breakpoint.cc> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org To: Florian Westphal Return-path: Received: from mail.us.es ([193.147.175.20]:45541 "EHLO mail.us.es" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751320AbbJQK6M (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Oct 2015 06:58:12 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20151017090047.GB30789@breakpoint.cc> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 11:00:47AM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote: > Hi Pablo > > Please consider pulling net-next into nf-next tree to obtain > commit > > ipv6: Pass struct net into nf_ct_frag6_gather > > There are bugs in openvswitch ipv6 defragmentation that are better > resolved on netfilter side (also simplifies nf side). > > Problem is that these patches don't apply cleanly to net-next. > So I can either send what I have and Dave will need to resolve > the (easy) conflicts, or I can rebase it on nf-next once you > pulled in the net change. Please, let me follow up now with a pull request for David with the batch that I have accumulated up to this point. Then, I'll be refreshing the nf-next tree. It will require some little wait though, let me know if this is fine to you, thanks.