From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Graf Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [RFC PATCH 1/5] netfilter: Remove IP_CT_NEW_REPLY definition. Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 01:32:11 +0200 Message-ID: <20151021233211.GF23554@pox.localdomain> References: <1445379629-112880-1-git-send-email-jrajahalme@nicira.com> <20151021083323.GB15539@pox.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netdev , dev@openvswitch.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org To: Jarno Rajahalme Return-path: Received: from mail-wi0-f174.google.com ([209.85.212.174]:37868 "EHLO mail-wi0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753880AbbJUXcN (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Oct 2015 19:32:13 -0400 Received: by wicfv8 with SMTP id fv8so96849360wic.0 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 16:32:12 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 10/21/15 at 01:15pm, Jarno Rajahalme wrote: > > > On Oct 21, 2015, at 1:33 AM, Thomas Graf wrote: > > I understand what you are doing here but this is part of the published > > UAPI and removing this might break compilation of a user application > > even if the definition is not used right now. It's probably safer to > > leave the definition and obsolete it with a comment. > > OK. I should probably separate the netlink and openvswitch changes to separate patches as well? Given that at that point the changes become unrelated, I'd split it into separate patches, yes.